/biz/ — /space/ - SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP GENERAL

File: 1781126521543279.gif (1.24 MB, 498x279)

>>62350246 (OP)
Must....not....COOOM

not buying this shit

>>62350247
>literally once in a lifetime chance to profit twice from a stock that will go up at 90% probability
>sit it out because too scared to do anything
Stay poor, faggot.

>>62350246 (OP)
Always do the opposite of what biz says.

I'm going to buy zero of it, then slurp during the bust. There's probably a future for spacex but people are piling in like retards

>>62350246 (OP)
I'm genuinely excited about this, it feels significant and entirely unknown.
The consensus appear to be pump IPO day, trade down the next 6 months.
But again, it could also do a reverse.. Not enough money out there to fill it up, trade lower from day one until a floor is found.
It's also possible that we will see an extended pump, index funds keeping buy pressure, for weeks/months, and retail - never knowing when to get out will just see there numbers go up and begin dreaming big with their "iron hands".

as I said, anything is on the table, gonna be super interesting.

>>62350246 (OP)
Could someone list the valuation and the reasoning behind it, by major business parts of this?

File: mars-1.png (1.52 MB, 916x914)

>>62350297
Best I can do is an image of a worthless planet.

>>62350246 (OP)
Already got plenty of RKLB and LUNR and doubled my money from it. SpaceX will probably swing wildly from everyone's conflicting narratives, just wait until the volatility dies down

>>62350246 (OP)
Sex!

>>62350314
The Jews are going to raw dog rape all these shabbos goyim who are buying this shit

>>62350246 (OP)
lol,source? what's that from

>>62350297
1.77 trillion dollars
>reasoning
uhhh....

Why does Pocahontas want to stop SpaceX ipo? Is she just doing it for attention?

>>62350466
Come up with a theory as to why to show you have at least tried before asking to be spoonfed

>>62350448
I'm guessing First Descendant

File: spcx closed.png (136 KB, 2268x668)

>>62350246 (OP)
>How much are you willing to throw at?

>>62350279
Launches just got a lot more interesting. Even though a single launch shouldn't matter in the big picture the market will use any excuse to pump or dump.

>>62350382
>"A-Any day now..."

File: sexo.jpg (26 KB, 480x344)

>>62350246 (OP)

File: IMG_4758.jpg (136 KB, 1072x593)

We be printing organs in space and shit

Guys, c'mon here... We are talking about elon musk... Star link and all that shit...

If you aren't in it. You hate money. Everyday i see a cyber truck.

>>62350564
>print heart in space
>take it back to earth
>immediately crushed to to size of a walnut by atmospheric pressure

no common sense

>>62350582
This ain’t Tesla you dumbass nigga what product do these space niggers even have? I’ll wait.

>>62350263
The biggest problem with SpaceX is that their biggest competitor for internet is fiber optics which will always be cheaper and easier to repair. Having internet in remote areas is cool, but you won't be reaching these multi trillion dollar valuations.
I think there is a massive, unavoidable short squeeze coming and GME and you have to find the money to pay for this kind of shit. Remember when Larry Fink is like "We're going to use private pension funds to build out data centers" etc. This is a bold faced admission that a lot of the money they pretend to have isn't actually capital but in fact "credit/liquidity". The timing of this IPO looks more like a smash and grab before the rugpull. They need money and they just conjured up some brand spanking new shares to sell you. And boy does everyone seem to know all about this "free" money they want you to buy.
The economy is dangerously saturated with debt, so much so that the U.S. government loses HALF of all its tax receipts to interest payments. We are on borrowed time before the bottom drops out and you find out shit is all fucked.

>>62350583
You’re right. This is why no human has ever returned from space.

>>62350247
Good thing The First Descendant is free.

>>62350632
SpaceX also owns xAI. xAI owns the colossus data center and is building a second one now. They will be the ones providing shovels during the AI gold rush equivalent. I’m going to buy a small pithy amount, maybe like $1000 just because I don’t normally buy single stocks.

>>62350246 (OP)
I'd explore her space, if you catch my drift

>>62350246 (OP)
I was under the impression that IPO shares would be distributed Friday, but open trading wouldn't start until Monday unless you have access to dark pools. Is that wrong?

>>62350709
According to my broker, limit orders are possible Friday but trading will not begin until sometime after open. No market orders until Monday.

File: 1000015542.png (496 KB, 693x1000)

>>62350246 (OP)
Anyone bought ASTS?

>>62350297
if you don't understand the technical aspects behind, its pointless

>>62350632
>The biggest problem with SpaceX is that their biggest competitor for internet is fiber optics which will always be cheaper and easier to repair.
wrong, exactly the opposite of reality
fiber is only cheaper if you have a lot of customers in the area and this threshold will keep increasing as launch costs come down (i.e. Starship) and the starlink satellites and system improves
at some point the only place where fiber will be competitive will be dense urban cores

File: 2026-06-11-002914.png (94 KB, 1799x1109)

>>62350898
>>62350632
https://research.33fg.com/analysis/fiber-vs-starlink-cost-vs-capacity
>Compared to today, in 2030, the model suggests that urban fiber costs will break even with Starlink at ~800 connected premises/km2, far closer to urban area density, although ~5x higher than Starlink capacity will be able to support. Thus, fiber will continue to win cities on capacity, not price. Nonetheless, we will likely see Starlink capture significant share in suburban areas (~500 premises/km2) by 2030, rather than just rural areas today.

File: 1780020505315585.webm (3.95 MB, 1228x690)

>>62350861
Dumped hard after the New Glenn rocket blew up. Some of the launches are with SpaceX though so they aren't totally fucked yet.

>>62350246 (OP)
>rumours that it'll go up 2x before Friday ends
lol

The etf for the industry has the ticker UFO, lol.

>>62350632
>"We're going to use private pension funds to build out data centers"
I'm getting tired of this. What do you think this statement means? Do you think they're going to steal money from those pensions? What do you think Blackrock and Vanguard and the rest actually do? What do you think pension funds do? What do you think is IN pension funds?

Excuse me retards, please see
>>62351026

>>62350960
The more specific one is NASA

>>62351039
You bought the company that made Sharliner and stranded astronauts on the ISS? The company that couldn't make a refueling tanker anywhere on time or budget even though it's based on an existing airframe? The company joint venture that was outlaunched in 5 years by a single SpaceX booster?

Why is there so much shilling going on in this thread? Are these bots?

>>62350246 (OP)
Do you think the elites believe that space exist?

>>62351054
Did I say Boeing? What the fuck is up with peoples reading comprehension these days. Is it Tik Tok brain?

>>62351039
>internet service company
Is that all SpaceX does?

>>62351107
Their main source of revenue is providing internet service, they have no defense capabilities LOL. I feel like I’m living in a clown world. I guess time will vindicate.

File: peepobeer.gif (51 KB, 638x494)

I'm not even buying their stocks but I'm still excited. It's the first time I'm around to see an IPO like this and I want to see how it will go down and how it will affect the market.

Buying on opening is suicide for the small guy. IPOniggers will slurp your liquidity.

For the full year 2025, SpaceX's final bottom-line number is a net loss of $4.93 billion. KABOOOOM! You guys are probably invested in XRP as well.

>>62350583
You must be really smart, I wish I had your IQ, must be nice

>>62351116
>they have no defense capabilities LOL
they do, it's called starsheild
speculated to be for target surveillance and tracking in addition to military internet

>>62350246 (OP)
>insiders buy $20/share
>retail buy $135/share
prepare to be dumped on
unironically the iq test of this decade

>>62351361
its still massively undervalued

>>62351346
Yes, I guess that’s legitimate. They were only awarded a few billion in contracts. There are other companies that provide satellite capabilities. Without giving too much away I’ve done work for Astranis before and they are up the same alley. A $2,000,000,000,000 valuation is absolutely retarded and has no justification.

MAGELLAN

>>62350898
>this threshold will keep increasing as launch costs come down
I'm sorry, but the capital involved in maintaining infrastructure in space is never going to be cheaper than what fiber optics can accomplish. If anything, fiber optics infrastructure is expanding to those hard to reach areas and Starlink will be losing customers.
The valuations are nonsensical and drastically overstating the profitability. This would be like investing in an airline company where its assets just depreciate more and more every year.

>>62351033
Normally pensions have pretty safe investment holdings. Money managers stating they want to undergo investment in massive capital projects basically reveals the monetary system is busted. They're telling you the money they need to kickstart these projects don't exist without the pensions. The tank is on E, fren.

>>62351033
"I'm getting so tiiiiired of this oooooy veeeeey"
>>62351502

>>62351575
it already is cheaper for serving rural areas

>>62350564
>We be printing organs in space and shit

*Astronaut displays her 3 most recent abortions.