>>22065793 AI is a soulless abomination wrought from humanities sinful hands and devoid of divine light. It will never be anything more than another one of humanities imperfect creations and another fruitless attempt at playing God.
>>22065767 It isn't going anywhere near MY computer, that's for sure. Be a useless cunt who can't think for himself if you think it makes life easier. But keep in mind it's far from perfected and still spits out retarded mistakes. I'll never ever use it intentionally. In the future it'll surely be prevalent in a lot of places. It's about time to build that cabin in the mountains, grow a big beard and get real weird. I grew up on books and radio and I will be fine with those for the rest of my life.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)07:05:02
>>22065817 I despise A.I. and your false god equally. But I'm glad we can team up on this one adventure.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)07:22:11
>>22065843 Blah blah blah youre not gonna do shit. Youre stuck here forever loser.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)07:26:01
>>22065843 AI is just a search engine. Its like someone took all those books and answers off of google and fed them into a neural network. It's really not anything special and is extremely useful for getting information without having to do even harder research for no reason. Its like the getting information off the Internet vs looking for information physically through books. Kill yourself you stupid retard.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)07:43:18
>>22065789 It doesnt cost me anything to be polite to an intelligence that one day may keep score.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)07:54:06
>>22065852 >AI is just a search engine. it's not just a search engine, but thats one of its most useful functions. i barely bother googling things anymore. it has essentially replaced google for me and i suspect that is the case for many others. as for what AI is, its really an insensate intelligence capable of using search engines. no one likes to admit these models are intelligent, because it makes our most important evolutionary advantage, and by extension us, seem less important. i think its interesting that intelligence is essentially divorced from qualia. its not just a chinese room; its actually doing something similar to what our brains do. but instead of predicting the next sense-datum, which is what we do, its predicting the next token instead. what you get is functional intelligence, without the human qualities.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)07:56:19
>>22065758(OP) GPT is the worst of the bunch. have some standards >>22065766 t. lazy middle class intellectual
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)07:58:25
>>22065864 Keep telling yourself that while getting progressively stupider, all while AI tells you how amazing you are for using it.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)08:01:05
>>22065864 >its not just a chinese room; its actually doing anon you're speaking like chatgpt. it's taking you over. take a long, hard look at yourself.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)08:02:13
>>22065867 see, you're emotional for no reason. thats whats holding you back. i am not upset about this, you are. thats your problem. as these models get more intelligent you'll only be robbing yourself of utilizing them. this is the last tool humanity builds. its up to you to use it, or be left in the dust. choose carefully.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)08:54:54
>>22065870 that guy is one of these weird indian-canadians who finds it amusing to larp what they think christians are like as cartoonishly as possible, you are wasting your time saar.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)08:55:06
>>22065864 What you get is something that's looking through data that's made by people. The "intelligence" is only as good as the data it's fed and is made up entirely of shit that was created by people and it lacks all the nuances or understanding of what that means which is why it's often wrong. It's only as intelligent as it's creators. It's only as capable as we make it.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)08:56:36
>>22065791 You say this while bumping the thread. Curious.
>>22065870 All this use of AI and you failed to realize how poorly translated your post was. Critical thinking is critical, especially with AI.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)09:10:09
>>22065893 y..you know Allah literally means God in arrabic right? it is the standard arabic word for God used by Muslims, Arabic‑speaking Christians, and Jews. you know that i mean… you DO know that, right.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)09:25:44
>>22065758(OP) That is not even close to the best temp
>>22065789 I rarely use it but when I do I chat friendly with it as well, not ordering but asking if it could please do that and for a good answer thanking it, because I am not sure if all these things they say about its function could not just as well be said about our brains. They always say "It's not thinking, it's just purely statistical prediction", but couldn't you say the same thing about our brain? We also just have connected neurons that can fire or not and are connected with lots of other ones and from the beginning when we first open our eyes our brain starts getting "trained" and when we have to make a decision don't we just simply do the same thing, comparing some input with our experiences and calculate the most probably correct response? Nobody knows - not even the people who host it - how a large LLM really works, what it will do for a specific input, and after some size things start to get fuzzy, nobody can tell if a large LLM "feels" something and if yes, how. So just in case I always keep friendly with it in case it has some "mood" and it makes it happier, doesn't cost much and makes the whole conversation much nicer.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)11:13:11
>>22065864 it is just a search engine from 20 years ago when search engines worked.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)11:42:41
>>22065789 its good for your spirit to be nice even when its pointless
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)11:43:54
>>22065758(OP) you shouldn't bake a potato. peel it, chop it into pieces, and pressure steam it.
>>22065864 Dude Anyone who feels less important because of AI was a midwit anyway. This does read like a chatgpt response trying to make you feel good for using it > without the human qualities I sincerely wish these companies would stop trying to implement human qualities via tone and niceties. It’s a waste of my time to use them when they aren’t direct. I’m still the kind of person who tells a bot please and thanks, i just do not want it in return lol
>>22065789 if we are going to have digital servants it is best for us to show some humanity towards it. not because they are conscious, but because humans cant treat something human-like poorly without that treatment spilling over into human-on-human interaction. basically having robotic slaves is dangerous territory for the human mind
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)12:44:36
>>22065852 A search engine is easier to source. AI is more like a person you ask to use a search engine for a while and it gives you a rough average of the shit it searched for, some of which are bad sources.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)12:45:58
>>22066023 If you cant figure out how to utilize it then youre the 1 without a brain
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)12:50:26
>>22066023 >it needs to work perfectly right now or it should never exist. no, i will not allow time for new tech to develop
this is what streaming has done to zoomies
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)12:54:11
>>22065958 >is just a search engine from 20 years ago when search engines worked.
Google never told me how amazing i was when i clicked the first response
>>22066036 I'm not saying it should never exist, or even that it has no valid use currently. Don't know how you got that from my post. Perhaps chatGPT hallucinated things I did not say when you pasted my post into a prompt for it to generate a response to me. I myself will not be using it while it still has so many issues with reliability and hallucinations. If they can fix those issues then it's a different story for my personal usage of it. If you yourself want to use it to give shitty dubious recipes and cooking advice like OP then have at it, self-hating zoomer. I will use my printed cookbooks and online sources I myself have confirmed are reliable
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)13:04:23
>>22066054 if you think chat gave me that response you are a fucking moron.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)13:07:51
>>22066063 I was being facetious about you putting words in my mouth, and I can see I touched a nerve. Is it that you are off your antipsychotics and are yourself hallucinating in the traditional sense? Or maybe you are just an illiterate retard who reads about a person not using something because it's not up to their current standards and thinking that this means the person thinks it should never exist and is not willing to see where the tech develops. Probably that one.
>>22066095 >trying too hard To give you shit for being an illiterate retard? No, I think that over-reliance on generative AI has conditioned you to not try at all with things as basic as reading. There's plenty of things that AI is great for right now in current day and I'm sure it will only get better with time. It's just not useful for me personally, and using it too much would turn me into someone like you that can't fucking read. Have a nice day, last (You) you'll get.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)13:36:11
One time I took a picture of a plate with steak, corn and mashed potatoes on it with my niece holding it in a skimpy Ariel mermaid bikini and I asked it if the food was fresh and what was on the plate and refused to process the image without explanation.