/fa/ — are chucks feminine?

>>18721786 (OP)
is OP a homosexual?

>>18721787
chucks arent gay. as a straight person i wear them all the time

they're young people coded, so if you equate neoteny with feminine traits, then yes.

twink shoes

File: 58c0a37583d1e.image.jpg (316 KB, 900x1100)

>>18721786 (OP)
I believe they are unisex. And considered so by most.

>>18721787
yes

>>18722114
can confirm

PSA: Dont reply to spam threads

File: 0e9f7b6c0e55da2d84dfee5651f7faa6.jpg (136 KB, 768x882)

>>18721786 (OP)
Everything women wear today was originally made for men. Chucks, Sambas, jeans, trousers, t-shirts, button up shirts, blazers, sunglasses. Nothing bonus holes wear is their own. It was all appropriated from men starting from the WW1 when more and more women began working in factories. So, no, chucks are for men.

File: Ženska_košarkarska_tekma_Maribor-Lokomotiva_Zagreb_1962.jpg (1.16 MB, 1271x1805)

>>18722181
Chucks are for basketballers. Stolen valour if you wear them but don't ball. Same polo shirts too. You need to ride a horse.

>>18722220
That’s not even the original purpose of a ”polo shirt”. It was designed as a tennis shirt and later adopted into the sport of polo.

File: Polo.png (955 KB, 874x1062)

>>18722227
You've got that backwards. They were always polo shirts, for centuries. They were adopted as tennis shirts after some Bongs saw Indian playing polo wearing those shirts.

>>18722220
i played varsity in high school, good enough?
the military used them as trainers too btw.

>>18722220
the highs are basketball shoes but the low tops and colored ones were marketed as fashion shoes from day 1.

>>18722238
That’s just a short sleeved shirt which doesn’t even have a collar and probably isn’t pique fabric.