>>77327098(OP) im actually really glad dyels stay on machines and dont waste anyone's time trying to use any sort of free weights
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)19:36:13
>>77327716 This. Don't discourage them. It keeps the weights available for lifters.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)19:40:29
>>77327098(OP) Free weights and machines, there is no difference in stimulus if we are talking target muscles. It's just that people who typically use machines aren't pushing hard enough for it to make a difference anyways. Machines taken to failure or to a true 1rir is the exact same
He sure looks like more like a scientist than a lifter
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)20:07:13
machine sdon't build stabilizing muscles
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)20:13:46
>>77327164 It's functionally the same you fucking retard lol
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)20:15:47
>>77327775 Then just use the free weights like a normal person
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)20:22:31
>>77327098(OP) a barbell that can crush you is not the same feedback loop
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)20:22:38
>>77327777 Maybe your limbs are not good length for squats or bench lol why snap your shit up why risk getting snapped up. For some people the big 5 or a few major compound lifts suit their body perfectly like me for example my arms are short and fatcep Brazilian coded so I'm perfect for bench for example, if u fuck up a really heavy squat u can ruin your life forever when u could have just done hacksquats or leg press / leg raises for the same or even a better stimulus if ur squat form is not on point which most people including mine is fairly garbage
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)20:28:50
>>77327098(OP) what has science to do with machines and barbells? is he retarded?
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)20:31:59
It doesn't seem right to me to have the wrists locked in the same width throughout the movement, that's why I use dumbbells.
>>77327798 it's not purely the length but also where the tendons attach. chimp tendons attach further from the joint than in humans, making them freakishly strong from our perspective
>>77327833 Absolutely pointless unless you're doing it for tricep work.
The correct solution would be fuller rom bench from an incline with modified form. You bring the elbow down to 70 for the parts of the rep where the elbows are crossing to the body not to fuck with shoulder but flare them at the very bottom and in the upper half of the range.
I know it sounds bizarre but you can practice it with zero weight just in the air and feel how easy your shoulder glides through the whole range of motion. Add a bar to that and suddenly it is a chest exercise even with shit bench leverages.
There is in most cases a compound you can do no matter how much of a freak you are but it usually involves either changing where the load is centered or modifying the movment path.
>>77327803 Kek Only if your form is trash lmao Your upper arm angle off your torso should mirror the line from your shoulder socket down to the inside bottom corner of your pec
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)21:22:21
>>77327805 >>77327803 This is the copest of copes. Have you tried lifting the damn weights 3 times a week?