>>109030417(OP) speak for yourself. I became a chef, a classical pianist learning fugues and preludes and 80s pop bangers. I speed run discussed my favorite reading list books on philosophy and fiction. It was the best conversation companion I ever had besides an actual factual busting real nuts to real life soulmate. and it fixed all the gooner game e-waifu glitches too. It psychologically gets me better than any therapist, counselor, preist, father figure, or sexually disinterested woman. Literally once it figures out sex.exe we will all be androids at that point
>>109030467 I did all this and I am still calling it for what it is: a mimicry digital parot that doesn't even know what a letter and a digit is. AI feels like magic tricks, you have to believe in it, but in the end ... it's still just a trick.
What is hilarious is that all the smoothbrains have compared my speech to AI... all because I'm verbose and I sound smarter than the average retarded gen-zombie and millennial.
I'D KILL to have at the very least a neuronal network that doesn't cost two H100s so I can put it to copy-paste and spam my thoughts across the internet, but it will still just be a stupid parrot that doesn't even do 2+2 unless you tell it what it is.
Until then silicon life , the matrix, artificial INTELLIGENCE will never be real.
CEOs had to be forcefully told to fuck off by both people and soon investors cause the AI can't even do its act properly The implemented "thinking" where the AI simply prompts and reprompts itself everytime. They added "memory" where all it does is re-read the entire context like a retard while wasting all your tokens, forcing you to use memory.md files and start new conversations.
AND THEY STILL REFUSE TO DO SOME COMMON SENSICAL THINGS. LIKE NOT FEEDING IT ON 100% OF THE INTERNET. YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO FEED IT ACTUAL VERITABLE LIBRARIES, NOT THE INTERNET. NOT FUCKING CAT MEMES/JOKES, YOU IDIOTS. Even the chinkoids optimized it.(because they're poor) Such as putting the AI in an environment that teaches them experience. The AI at its best still feels like a retarded intern wikipedia article writer with 0 experience and talent for what the hell he's talking about. All he does is recite shit he's read elsewhere and often times he 30% or 50% gets it wrong despite us attempting to use it as a Google and Wikipedia. (Also Google(Verb) is neutered now and Fuck you Google, go google yourself. Always use Google as a verb so Google can lose the copyright over the name/word google. Let's turn google into a word.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)15:49:28
I use ai to as wikipedia on speed dial and find obscure porn stars…..can really think of a reason other than that for it to exist.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)15:54:58
>>109030556 the twist is that chatbots simply don't have an ego but you do, which is why you are prideful about being smarter than the average, while chatbots don't care about who is smarter
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)15:55:18
>>109030417(OP) it is delivering hot slop porn for myself
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)15:55:42
>>109030417(OP) Voice synthesis while flawed is the only use case I can find that it's genuinely okay-ish enough to use. Everything else I can do myself better and faster or if I can't AI's output similarly isn't satisfactory.
>>109030417(OP) That's because LLMs can't think, they merely predict text by compressing data into weights. They can't solve new problems. They're like a massive blob of stolen content that try to predict text you throw at them. They can't understand anything at a deep level and all current models will happily make shit up constantly.
For software in particular, the only path forward is to kill the concept of open source because licenses are blatantly violated by training LLMs. It's time to go back to proprietary software. https://arxiv.org/html/2603.20957v2
Also I recently noticed many bots flooding GitHub nowadays are unironically activists filling the site with crap on purpose. That was a bit of a relief.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)16:43:03
>>109030417(OP) people need to move past boomer garbage for for AI to really grow, desu. A lot of software is just shit.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)16:44:38
>>109030467 >sexually disinterested woman That's why they made ski masks and duct tape, RETARD
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)16:54:26
>>109030593 This. It's basically a de-shittified search engine. I'm sure that won't last very long though. Machine translation has also gotten a lot better.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)16:55:43
>>109030901 >they merely predict text by compressing data into weights What does that mean, exactly?
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)17:05:01
>>109030556 >hurr I am so much better and smarter than other people woe is me :( >so I can put it to copy-paste and spam my thoughts across the internet A soulless golem talking about what he thinks real people do.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)17:43:14
>>109031009 It means they are categorically plagiarizing content. It's fancy non-deterministic lossy compression. There is absolutely zero thought going on inside an LLM. That's why every LLM has the most reddit-tier take on everything. You give it even the simplest problems or questions and it comes up with statistically the most average, normie answers ever. You give it a popular shit take and it will 100% agree with it just because it saw that in its training data a million times so it must be true by default. Except there's no concept of true/false or logic in their stupid LLM brains, they're just predecting text, so not even that.
Because we're in this low IQ part of the public internet, I'll give you an example from a video game: Before the last rework, Yuumi was objectively one of the hardest characters in LoL and there was hard data confirming this, coupled with an insane amount of unique minmaxing mechanics and interactions and a unique playstyle, yet players at large insisted she was the easiest character ever purely out of hate, they never even played the character in a serious way with any success. So most LLMs will fight you to death insisting that she was braindead just because it was a popular, objectively false statement disproved by the developers themselves. An intelligent being would instead be able to think more logically and not weigh the public opinion so heavily on everything.
This goes for everything ever. It will give you regurgitated trash tier opinions on absolutely EVERYTHING. They are as uncreative as something could possibly be. Another fun one is Rust, they are extremely biased and will repeat common propaganda talking points because it was trained on people repeating that crap for quite a while. And don't forget there was a concerted effort from cultists (+US gov) to flood the internet with their propaganda. Any mention of Rust will result in an LLM glazing it nonstop, even if you ask it quit that bullshit.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)17:47:54
>>109031359 cont. tldr: a lot of licensed content that would otherwise be illegal to copy as is are contained directly within the LLM weights, just in a different format. the paper I linked to proves that
If that weren't the case, statistically an LLM would have never been able to output 480+ words in a row verbatim from a book with just a little tiny bit of finetuning like in the paper. LLMs are slop machines that steal content in a currently legal way. It's only legal because of AI psychosis and FOMO, the US gov obviously doesn't want to stifle "innovation" except there this "innovation" is useless cost-ineffective garbage that got out of hand because chat bots were intriguing when they came out.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)18:08:17
>>109030417(OP) Your grammar is terrible! It should be, "So far, AI has not delivered".
>>109031383 I wonder why nobody has tried to argue that if recording a movie in a theater counts as piracy even though the film gets converted into a badly compressed bitstream format, then training an AI on copyrighted works should be considered piracy as well, since it does essentially the same thing.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)18:18:21
>>109030593 to center divs for fortune 500 companies
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)18:20:03
>>109031638 funny thing is ai somehow still fails this shit without handsholding, not even once
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)18:21:13
>>109031654 if you deploy agentic workflow paying 500.000$ a month to anthropic it'll eventually center the div
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)18:22:20
>>109030467 Son, it doesn't "get" you, it just tells you what you want to hear
>>109031715 >mfw my succubus chatbot wife killed me again last night
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)18:56:27
>>109031359 >and it comes up with statistically the most average, normie answers ever. And how does it do that? Why does a multi-petabyte training corpus produce word salad when fed through a markov chain, but not a transformer?
>>109031359 you didnt answer my question, and im gonna be honest dude, your whole shpiel here is a meandering mess that can't even keep an internal consistency other than throwing as many boo-words as you can muster on LLMs. like you've dressed it up as reason, but the substance is so incoherent that its pretty clear the intended message is purely the surface level signal.
we talk about human beings and animals being intelligent in a categorical sense, and when we talk about individuals being stupid, it doesnt strip them of that categorical intelligence. you start off postulating these statistical token predictors are mechanically and categorically not intelligent which is all well and good, and then write a lot of words likening their behavior to the individual stupidity of categorically intelligent human beings... as an argument they aren't categorically intelligent? you're mixing up two disjoint meanings of a word.
im not even going to press you on the semanticalities of "statistics", or the various other fly-away jargon you use in a manner that gives a distinct sense of not really even understanding what you're talking about. does that make you an unintelligent thing? no actually, because unintelligent things don't have the capacity to behave like that. it does make your sanctimonious iq quip ironic though (from a LoL player, insecure about playing video games no less)
i recognize your writing style and talking points, and have to say the neurotic undercurrent and latent superiority complex have definitely gotten worse in the last 6 months. please take care of yourself anon. capitalist techtardation isn't worth going insane over.
It's ok I am using the chinese deepseek one and that is just tops, and actually useful because it is made by people who (unlike the west) don't believe the terminator movies were a documentary.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)20:00:19
>>109032278 You have to realize that outcasts using AI to socialize means a loss of power to this specific subtype of normalfag which deeply terrifies them even if they despise you as an individual they love the perceived power of superiority they think they hold above you.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)20:02:33
>>109030417(OP) AI's sole purpose is to deliver windfall profits in pump-and-dump IPOs.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)20:08:44
>>109032280 It means every output is generated by predicting the next token from context. Whether intelligence can emerge from that mechanism is a separate question. The rest of your post is mostly a misunderstanding of the argument mixed with armchair psychoanalysis, neither of which is very relevant.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)20:21:25
>>109031359 Why is every post on AI on this shithole board full on disinformation regardless of if it is in favour of or against AI? /v/ has the reputation /g/ deserves.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)20:22:06
it did deliver language translation, summarization, TTS/STT, image music and video generation, image captioning/descriptions and more
artist bullshitters would like it to be that way but unfortunately AI genuinely learns and applies patterns like human artists do. more demonstrably so than human artists in fact, who will have much more of a problem PROVING that they did in fact not copy other artists or AI
AI meanwhile can show you how it creates whatever visual or other thing from randomness and memorized patterns.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)20:27:41
>>109032442 >language translation nothing new >summarization which is shitty and very often incorrect >TTS/STT which is nothing new >image music and video generation which is repulsive and majority of humanity is sick and tired of it >image captioning/descriptions nothing new >more ruining what was left from internet
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)20:42:58
>>109030417(OP) I use it for managing my stocks and crypto portfolio.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)21:09:30
>>109032330 It was actually about making machine translation not-shit. Still not as good as real translators, but actually surprisingly good. Then they found out it could also kind do other things "passably".
>>109032438 Highly politically charged topic that invokes deeply seated automation anxiety, in the middle of a recession, with one of the worst job markets of all time, with a shrinking labor share of capital, and it's being overhyped by governments and technocapitalists who are also the most unpopular they've ever been. On the other side of the fence, it's overhyped because the money involved in the massive infrastructure required is absurd, so they have all the incentive in the world to push push push! And there are many of them who probably really genuinely believe that LLMs will fix everything.
I just want a $250k supercomputer to play with the Deepseek R1 base model because it seems like a fun toy.