/his/ — >"If our gay men don't fuck the asses of other men, who shou

File: 1777242087996166.jpg (50 KB, 622x640)

>>18528651 (OP)
>How do you respond without sounding conservative, /his/?
Impossible because the conservative position would be the right-libertarian one (aka the correct one) which is to say that it doesn't matter what men do behind closed doors in the privacy of their own domiciles and that they have the right to live their lives how they see fit so long as they do not tread on the rights of others.

>>18528651 (OP)
They should hang publicly for the crime of sodomy

>>18528954
>the conservative position is exactly the same as the postmodern one o algo

File: Gaetan_Dugas.jpg (14 KB, 250x384)

>*pozzes your neg hole*
how do you respond without sounding mad?

>>18528964
>sodomy
"Sodomy" in the context of the Bible isn't talking about all homosexuals because ancient people didn't see sexualities as personal identities, they just saw sex as either a dominant or submissive action, and people of power were expected to fullfill a dominant role, that doesn't mean they were expected to fuck men in the ass mind you because a dominant role could also just be a man engaging in regular sex, but the point is that "sodomy" in this context just refers to someone of lesser social status trying to frame someone of higher social status as submissive, aka someone wanting to upset the social order. The Bible makes it perfectly clear that slavery is acceptable for example, and to be a sodomite was to subvert this master-slave relationship.

>>18528986
>"Sodomy" in the context of the Bible isn't talking about all homosexuals because ancient people didn't see sexualities as personal identities
Agreed, the concept of sexual orientation is illegitimate and sexual identities are invalid. However, sodomy describes “homosexuality” inasmuch as this word refers to a behavior. Homosexual acts merit the penalty of death according to God’s word.
>"sodomy" in this context just refers to someone of lesser social status trying to frame someone of higher social status as submissive
This has nothing to do with the biblical prohibition of homosexual acts. The word “sodomy” is never used in the original languages of holy writ, this is a post-biblical term developed in law to describe unnatural acts of men with men. The bible instead describes the prohibited act itself, i.e. “men laying with men”. This merits the penalty of death.

>>18528954
This is an incomplete opinion to have, what they do in private concerns themselves, this doesn't mean that you can't err in private but only err in public, it means your private errors are between you and God which can and hopefully will forgive them while your public errors are subject to the ''free'' wills of other people and thus the injustice gains more parties to consider. In a way, taxation without proper recompense is quite possibly one of the best ways to fuck yourself over in the ultimate court of law that is the judgement of God

>>18528981
>GAY tan DUG ASS
Who makes this stuff up? Really breaks the immersion.

>>18528651 (OP)
Gay sex is unnatural
Penises were not designed to be inserted into the anuses of other men
Penises are specifically evolved for the function of being inserted into the vagina
They literally exist FOR the vagina. FOR women
Not for other men
Semen is specifically meant for women NOT for men
Gay sex is against nature
It is an abuse of the body
It is improper

>>18529174
>penises are FOR women
Simp.

>>18529193
Faggot

>>18529174
>Penises were not designed to be inserted into the anuses of other men
They were, hence why male most pleasuring spot is the prostate

Also your post reeks of seething ugly foid that got rejected by cute twinks

>>18529248
You will die of AIDS and go to hell

>>18529248
The prostate doesn’t contain the same nerves as the penis which allow pleasure sensation. It’s physically impossible for it to cause pleasure, you deranged freak

>>18529256
NTA but that's not accurate. The prostate develops and splits off from sexual organs during fetal development, that's why it can be sexually stimulated. Call it a weird evolutionary quirk (or your so-called intelligent creator taking the piss if you so prefer)

>>18529264
During fetal development nothing is distinct from anything else and everything splits off, it doesn’t mean there’s sex nerves in it

>>18529270
There is actually
>>18529256
Chriskike cope

>>18529252
>AIDS
Nah there is prep, I'll enjoy being pounded by handsome men and you will stay jerking your micropenis to japanese porn cartoons and praying for the nailed rabbi for a tradwife or algo

>>18528651 (OP)
Masculine gayness are based and peak male. It was the jew who invented all the feminized slop to poison their well and stop them from rising up and sodomizing the jews back to babylon

File: 1775682167529027.png (91 KB, 399x353)

All human beings are actually varying degrees of bisexual but this board isn't ready to have this conversation

>>18529354
It's true, christkeks seethe about how it's unnatural but their hold on the west has weakened and people aren't suppressed by Abrahamic schizophrenia anymore.

>>18528968
willy II would dress up in a tutu on his ship and several of his close associates like graf zu eulenberg were confirmed homosexuals.
napoleons finance minister was an open homosexual.
friedrich the great was rumoured to be a homosexual.
nobody (except plebs, who of course didn't know), cared because they weren't in your face about it.

>>18528954
What if a child is in there?

>>18529354
there are two other axis as well, namely necrophilia and pedophilia as well so sexuality in terms of -philia is actually more accurately modeled as R^3.

File: 1780673788448054.png (130 KB, 346x346)

>>18529494
Hot take here: pedophilia is not understood well enough because of its social taboos for me to make any definitive statements regarding it

>>18529517
It can never be understood well enough, the west has been mindfucked into producing endless discourse on Sex and sexual categories without ever reaching a definitive conclusion on it.

>>18529116
>Gaytan from a wasteland

"Hot take here: foot fetish is not understood well enough because of its social taboos for me to make any definitive statements regarding it"

What a dumbass, pedophelia is just a nasty kink

Considering how insane you all sound, I wouldn't be surprised you guys target gay men and guide them to ruin.

Much like Athena guides the heroes to their doom, much like the cosmic railway threw the Lord off course.

And Queen sucks. Too mainstream and the guy was gross anyway. Its the influence of the entertainment industry that turned art communication into a commodity.

>>18529354
Im exclusively into males. That's why I need other homos to exist.

>>18528981
The West is a cultural mistake that worships a woman goddess and hates gay men, that her useless ass needs anyway lmao

>>18529174
Your whole existence is unnatural.

I challenge you all to make a civilization worth living in without having gays in it.

The challenge is real, btw.

Phew! All in a day's work and even while feeling miserable.

File: 1777941924984186.jpg (32 KB, 512x494)

>>18530011
You somehow just made the gayest post in this thread. Congratulations and happy pride

>>18529174
>Gay sex is unnatural
and yet it happens in nature so that statement makes no sense
>Penises were not designed to be inserted into the anuses of other men
or the mouths of women or hands or tits but that doesn't stop you or anyone using your penis outside the realm of pure sexual reproduction.
>Penises are specifically evolved for the function of being inserted into the vagina
see above
>They literally exist FOR the vagina. FOR women
see above again
>Not for other men
why? Try to answer without using the circular and silly statements I've already addressed above
>Gay sex is against nature
tautology of your very first statement
>It is an abuse of the body
How is me giving my hot boyfriend a nice sloppy bj that makes us both feel good at the end and strengthens our bond with one another "abuse of the body"?
>It is improper
meaningless value judgement

>>18530021
>and yet it happens in nature so that statement makes no sense
Equivocation fallacy. Here natural = purpose
>reee but evolution is purposeless!
Technically speaking, true. But because evolution isn't an intelligent being. It's not wrong to say that certain body parts have natural functions to them and that using them in ways contrary to that might actually be harmful. In general anal sex is painful for both men and women because the anus was not designed to receive the penis. It is contrary to its "purpose" as a bodily organ. It can actually cause damage or harm to that organ. You feel pain in anal sex because the body is saying, "No stop that! That's not where that goes!"

>why? Try to answer without using the circular and silly statements I've already addressed above
Because the penis has the structure it does specifically so it can be put into the vagina as the anon above mentioned. It literally is shaped the way it is and functions the way it does for vaginas. Not for the anus. Not to have contact with other males. Literally and actually for the purpose of reproduction with females. It's literally a simple key and lock analogy. Penis = key, vagina = lock. The penis perfectly fits the vagina, not the anus or mouth.

>How is me giving my hot boyfriend a nice sloppy bj that makes us both feel good at the end and strengthens our bond with one another "abuse of the body"?
Well you're a degenerated freak weirdo who does abnormal things, so of course it doesn't seem degrading or shameful to you. But the fact of the matter is that it is. Like literally imagine openly admitting to people, "Yeah well I like to put my dick up the buttholes of other guys and/or like to have my butthole get stretched by another guy, going completely against the natural function of my body parts."

>meaningless value judgement
Humans are creatures of value, fag. You wouldn't know that though because you're a degenerate piece of subhuman shit.

>muh natural

lol, christkeks are fucking golems

File: 1.-wiki-1668227826.jpg (73 KB, 1000x750)

>>18530161
NTA but if you're defining natural by purpose then we can just look to our third closest relative after niggers and chimps, bonobos. They fuck each other constantly, be it male or female they will fuck either way. Most biologists believe that it's done to help build up community and relationships between members of the same sex. In humans this can also be seen through examples like Thebes.
>anal pain
In intelligent creatures the social part of evolution can develop faster than the biology which can lead to successful strategies while still having vestigial biology that dampens that success.
For example in some wasps they have developed sexual reproduction in all workers which means any queen that's born basically a parasite on the colony as they don't work. The colonies are able to rapidly grow because of their new trait but are still hampered by the old trait of queen's.
>degenerate
There wasn't really any taboo in the ancient world around non reproductive sex. It was only when jewish moral values spread around the Roman empire that opinions turned on it.

>>18530161
Fucking christkikes. You make an appeal to nature argument against homosexuality, than when it is pointed out that gay sex is common in nature you reject it, wrongly calling it an equivocation fallacy like an idiot.

The rest of your arguments are basically just...

>ew I think this is gross and muh bible says...

I'm gonna stop you right there. I don't care what your book of jewish shizo babble fairytales and pretend sandnigger god says. Much less what personally offends you. You can just get fucked and seethe pride month like the impotent little christcuck you are.

>>18530316
Bonobos exhibit many unique sexual traits not observed in other primates. Pretty much all of them are bisexual, meaning that while they do engage in homosexual activity with one another, they also engage in heterosexual activity, unlike faggots and dykes who are typically exclusively homosexual and do reproduce as is proper to sex. Also Bonobos may have evolved special traits to their genitalia which accommodate homosexuality. Their females have very large clitorises that can be easily rubbed together. Also, note that adult male bonobos have sex with infant bonobos, and this is pretty much always consensual, and infant bonobos often initiate this sexual activity with adult bonobos. Using Bonobo sexuality to justify faggottry in humans isn't a good argument. You can use it to justify pedophilia if you want to go that route. Just because we observe certain behavior in a species doesn't even mean that behavior is actually good for the species anyway.
>>18530319
Lol seethe I'm not even a Christian. But Leviticus 20:13 is still funny as hell lol. Seethe lefty fag.

>>18530336
>I'm not even a Christian
Muzzie, Kike or Poopjeet then, no inbetween

>>18528651 (OP)
I ain't no fag pal. The only people fucking my man-ass are girls.

File: img-3202278093.jpg (175 KB, 980x551)

>>18530336
>homosexuality isn't natural
>OK it is natural but it it doesn't have a purpose
>OK it does have a purpose but I don't like it because of jewish morality
Again, no one in the ancient world thought this way and it was only through the introduction of jewish values that people started to look down on non reproductive sex.
>>18530358
As our ancestors intended

>>18530369
Appeal to tradition fallacy. Face it. The penis is specifically made to fit in the vagina. That's its nature. Homosexuals abuse nature.

>>18530369
Fucking children isn't reproductive.

Appeal to some omnipresent 'nature' is the same thing as citing God. It really should be classed as a fallacy.

>>18530407
Enjoy hell. You're gonna burn, sodomite scum.

>>18530407
appeal to nature is basically a fallacy because you can just argue that everything is technically natural which makes it a non-argument. I guess an appeal to God would just be an appeal to the supernatural

is it true gays hate femaleness and are fundamentally attracted to males because they are just attracted to themselves? they see a penis, think "hmmm it feels good to do this to it so its hot if I did it to another guy." is it the fact that the female body is just so foreign to them that they are repulsed by it despite the fact that nature evolved them to want it???

>>18530667
They just have a brain parasite desu. It warps their mind. Basically it works like this:
There are top gays and bottom gays
Ok so in tops gays the parasite makes their brains detect other males as if they were females, and actual females as if they were males, and hence they want to impregnate males which their brain wrongly detects as females.
But in bottoms gays the parasite makes them think they literally are women and they want to become impregnated by men. So their brain doesnt wrongly detect the sex of other people but their very own sex.
Basically this is what I've learned, or at least this is what /pol/ has told me.

>>18530669
hmmm so has anyone tried to find a cure or is it too politically charged to do that?

File: 279eguwwvyo71.png (55 KB, 923x467)

>>18530677
See pic rel

File: 1756172312805994.jpg (64 KB, 735x1005)

I mean if ID: py0xKsdM on 4chan.org/pol/ said it then it must be true...

>>18530686
You would only think /pol/ is wrong if you're a Jew. Fuck off Jew.

>>18530161
>It is contrary to its "purpose" as a bodily organ.
To argue this implies that the penis only has one purpose (reproduction), but seemingly it has another purpose of pleasure. It can stimulated by a plethora of other things other than the vagina in which it still be very pleasurable. Hands, mouths, anuses, or even (in your case) sockpuppets. Perhaps one can make the argument that anal sex will specifically damage the anus or penis, but then seemingly all of these other ways of stimulating the penis are perfectly safe, and the penis cannot tell the difference. The body does not have a means of communicating that towards the penis, why is that?

Arguments from nature/natural law without appealing to God seem incredibly weak in general.

anal sex is sinful, even penetrating femboys, however platonic love between men is not

>>18530701
Well the penis experiences pleasure in order to facilitate vaginal sex. You are retarded.

File: 07d4d711a5072f299fc80cd86c58eb5c.jpg (46 KB, 677x680)

that idea that your penis' only purpose is to penetrate vaginas is immediately debunked every time you have to take a piss

>>18530710
I didn't say reproduction is its only purpose. However that is its primary function. Like yeah absolutely bodily organs can be adapted to new purposes over time, sure. It's why mouths, which are mainly made for eating, also breathe and allow us to talk. It's called exaptation I believe and it does happen all the time. Birds happen to shit where they also reproduce. That organ is meant for both functions. As for the human anus though, well, its not meant to receive a penis. The anus can get damaged if someone puts a penis inside of it. Most people do not get pleasure but get pain from anal sex. Anal sex isn't healthy. Anal sex can lead to more STDs. Men were not evolved to have sex with other men. Their bodies were not adapted to this. It is not natural. It is against nature. Penises are specifically, and functionally, meant for vaginas. Anuses are specifically and purposefully meant to expell shit from the digestion track. Semen is a fluid meant to transfer sperm from the male body into the female body. It doesn't belong in an anus. It certainly doesn't belong to other men!

>>18528651 (OP)
If a man gets raped by another man, does it make him gay?

>>18530725
In Twelvers Islam (the sect Iran follows) it is as the victim is also put to death. I don't know about other sects though.

>>18530724
>muh nature and shiet
Everytime you wear clothing everytime you eat processed, hell even cooked food, everytime you use electricity, running water, take a shit on a toilet, trim your hair, use a vehicle, you're altering nature to your needs, this pathetic fallacy reeks of a muzzie/crosscuck too ashamed to admit it so it appeals to other pathetic fallacies. Yes Anal can be harmful but hetero males are obsessed with fucking their women on the ass too, and most gay men are sides (IE they care only for frotting, bjs, hjs,etc...)

I don't even know why I'm bothering replying to room temp IQ subhuman who never touched a woman in life.

>>18530667
I merely have 0 sexual attraction towards them, I don't know why shitskinned hetmoids have such a hard time understanding it, the same way you (or so you claim) feel about men I feel about women

>>18530669
>>18530682
Literally chemicals turning le frogs gay insanity tier, please check a psychiatrist

>>18530794
>Everytime you wear clothing everytime you eat processed, hell even cooked food, everytime you use electricity, running water, take a shit on a toilet, trim your hair, use a vehicle, you're altering nature to your needs, this pathetic fallacy reeks of a muzzie/crosscuck too ashamed to admit it so it appeals to other pathetic fallacies.
You're still equivocating you dumb subhuman fucking retard. Not the original anon who posted but I already explained by how nature they are talking about function or purpose not necessarily the physical environment. Holy shit you are dumb.

>I merely have 0 sexual attraction towards them, I don't know why shitskinned hetmoids have such a hard time understanding it, the same way you (or so you claim) feel about men I feel about women
Yeah it's generally hard for normal human beings to contemplate all kinds of fucked up, weird, and gross shit some subhuman trash like you do, you know like pedophilia, zoophilia, necrophilia. Faggotry is on the same level
>REEE BUT ITS CONSENSUAL REEE REEEEEEE
Ok so gay brother incest is too. Let that be acceptable, faggot. Fact of the matter is that it's not normal, it's disgusting, it's a violation of the natural use of body parts, and it's utterly shameful. You don't feel ashamed knowing that you put your dick in the buttholes of other men or, even more shameful, have a guy put a dick up your ass? It's a completely shameful and degrading activity to engage in. How can you live with yourself? Knowing that you engage in these vile, unnatural acts, acts which are meant for women, not other men! Gross! I don't give a flying fuck about how you feel. How you feel is disordered, disgusting, and a total perversion of the natural order. YOUR DICK IS LITERALLY NOT SUPPOSED TO GO IN ANOTHER MANS SHIT HOLE! FUCKING GROSS! Fucking weirdo you are. You should get made fun of.