Would he still be hated if he hadn't done the holocaust?
Would people, besides neo-nazis, admire him?
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)01:09:34
>>18529552(OP) sending all the jews to go live in hell, removing satan's synagogue from christian lands, establishing a jew state in the middle east and involuntarily deporting all jews there... that was Hitler doing God's good work.
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)01:19:10
>>18529552(OP) no, he would still have been a nasty dictator who started a massive war, committed a ton of war crimes, lost and ruined germany. there isn't a single positive contribution you can point to of his.
>>18529554 >establishing a jew state in the middle east That was Stalin
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)01:42:50
>>18529569 its probably safe to assume everyone wanted to send the jews to hell
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)01:57:46
>>18529552(OP) Governments of nations he invaded would obviously still see him as evil.
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)02:39:52
>>18529559 Napoleon did all the same shit, and yet normies and “scholars” love him
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)03:02:07
>>18529552(OP) Probably >>18529554 >sending hebes to the holy land is... le good! Mazel tov!
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)03:04:41
>>18529569 That was in the Far East, not the Middle East
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)03:08:59
>>18529655 He actually created both Israel and JAO. Truly a visionary
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)06:13:15
>>18529628 This. I'm tired of Redditors lionising Napoleon, who was just a power-hungry monster at the end of the day
>inb4 muh Code Napoleon A lawbook isn't worth millions of deaths, it's not even worth 20 deaths
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)10:24:39
Neo-nazis often seem to delude themselves into thinking that people only dislike Hitler for jew-related stuff, but come on, even if holocaust never happened, he’s still responsible for millions and millions of deaths through war and occupation.
There’s literally no reason to like him unless you’re some German national supremacist, and even then I’d question liking him because he bit off more than he could chew and ended up getting the country occupied and split.
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)11:36:42
>>18530019 I would say that the Allies are responsible for that since they pushed Germany into a total war instead of looking for a peace deal.
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)11:44:58
>>18529552(OP) travel through south america and western and central asia and youll see that people still love him
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)11:48:51
>>18529628 Sorry Napoleon never industrialized the killing of civilians like Hitler did in the Holocaust
>>18529652 Land isn't holy, that's idolatry, and yes forcing all jews to live together in hell is good for the whole world.
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)12:36:00
>>18530100 The Allies were only responding in kind to a war Germany started.
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)12:38:25
>>18530167 But Hitler did offer pretty generous surrender terms for Poland? Not to mention that Germany did try to solve the Danzig problem via diplomacy.
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)13:36:01
>>18529628 you have the same history knowledge as a slum dwelling pajeet. you are subhuman.
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)13:54:49
If he hadn't done the holocaust, the Jews would make one up anyway
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)14:34:25
>>18529552(OP) He would still be hated if he had just deported them all. But people wouldn't see him as the most evil man on Earth who has ever lived.
Neo nazis would admire him just the same I think. They are mostly driven by hatred of blacks (in the US) and immigrants from the middle east (Europe). It's more the ethnostate thing than the jew killing.
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)16:01:10
>>18529552(OP) >Would he still be hated if he hadn't done the holocaust? of course not, the jews would never lie about anything.
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)17:22:30
>>18529628 Napoleon wasn't loved by anyone outside of France. He was a controversial name that bongs and other European empires treated like the name 'Hitler' today. It was synonymous with tyranny and political ambition.
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)17:37:34
>>18530417 To be fair, Poles and Jews celebrate Napoleon for liberating them and hate Hitler for obvious reasons. Hitler is kind of like the anti-Napoleon
>>18530172 >solve the Danzig problem via diplomacy. Give me the land or else it is war isn't exactly a diplomatic solution
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)05:20:35
>>18530172 Hitler wasn't exactly seen as the most trustworthy guy at that point.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)05:50:28
>>18529628 Quick question? Professor Moriarty is the <what> of crime?
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)05:54:56
Gaydolf Shitler was a British spy, working for international Rotschild capitalist banksters
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)06:03:46
>>18529552(OP) Yes, possibly not as much as he is now. But more or less the same, he did a lot more than just the Jew thing. Probably not, he'd have to have left some meaningful legacy. >>18530417 Napoleon had a large cohort of fan-boys during the nineteenth century, though. In and outside of France. More or less as large as his haters.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)08:26:53
>>18530964 He didn't ask for that, look up the 16 points, they were fair.
>>18531203 He had not broken an agreement. I like how some people try to use the Munich agreement to say he was untrustworthy but you just have to look what's actually written to see he didn't actually break it.
>>18531270 tranndolf gaytler choked on cyniade while Red Army heroes had fun with nazi whores in Berlin, 500 metres from his cuck chair, be aware of this fact every minute of your life
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)11:47:48
>>18531270 >point 1. The free city of Danzig shall join the German Reich So he did ask for the land. What right did Germany have to demmand land from a soverign nation and if said nation refused it is war? That is more of a mugging than anything.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)11:55:03
>>18529552(OP) The more interesting question is how the Allies would ideologically shape the post-WW2 world if there were no Holocaust. Probably stuff like Frankfurt School, Popperism, New Left, and various other leftist and liberal trends wouldn't really exist, and bigotry would be more widely accepted. Nazism wouldn't be looked on as a metaphysical evil but it would still be decried because of warmongering. However processes like decolonization, desegregation, mass immigration etc. would still occur because of the Cold War and economic conditions
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)14:10:00
>>18531383 It was a free city with it's own government which didn't belong to Poland. They themselves wanted to join back into Germany.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)14:18:04
>>18531291 >Red Army heroes They had fun killing Poles and putting their own kin into Gulags.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)14:45:39
>>18531270 I'm sure if Germany and Poland came to some kind of an agreement for Poland hand over the Corridor, a later German invasion of Poland wouldn't have broken that agreement.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)14:50:30
>>18531390 >The more interesting question is how the Allies would ideologically shape the post-WW2 world if there were no Holocaust. The Holocaust was already swept under the rug for decades after WW2 in na effort to make reintegrating a re-armed Germany into the West less awkward. The ceaceless exploitation and jerking off over the Holocaust is a relatively recent phenomenon.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)14:57:13
>>18531509 Point 15 would have that covered for the short term at least.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)15:04:01
>>18531473 based, death to facists kraut and polacks