>>65227393 they're joining all the projectiles together which reduces coverage and makes the whole thing miss if it pulls to one side. just pack like 6-10 pairs of counterweights. or maybe a few triples
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)07:04:09
>>65227309(OP) How would the FPV fire ball-and-chain bolas to stop ziggers from running? Seems like a lot of weight for too little gain.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)08:03:21
>>65227433 ziggies aren't the only ones getting FPV'd and not all of them run. plenty of videos of guys trying and failing to shoot down FPVs, both russian and Ukrainian. kikes are experiencing a dose of this too now.
I think the optimal anti-FPV shot would be a stack of pairs of counterweights. not one big spider as in >>65227393 because the whole thing pulls to one side, but a bunch of pairs. the ropes between the weights sweep a much larger volume of space and have a much higher chance of intersecting an immediately critical component of the FPV such as the rotors than a simple point-spread of birdshot
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)08:17:35
>>65227309(OP) All those things are very effective at their respective jobs, i don't know what you're on about
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)09:52:57
>>65227467 >think the optimal anti-FPV shot would be a stack of pairs of counterweights I see a possible problem that they would tangle into one web anyway. Probably you can use different weights, and stack them heavy first, lighter behind, maybe it will separate them in flight, or may be not.
>>65227309(OP) >make specialist rifle rounds >train soldiers right there is a reason those getting minced by drones either have shitty situational awarness(vehicles) or are conscripts
>line up several black powder cannons with grapeshot to shoot down drones why wouldn't this work?
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)20:03:50
>>65228858 more than what is covered by a couple point projectiles
you need to model this as the area in which a propeller hub could be and have one of the blades intersect the bolo. many times greater than birdshot. >>65227581 you need to put some sort of padding between them, maybe separate them out radially with a sabot.
but packed with a larger number of bolos. maybe like 6. arrange them string first, with a counterweight shape that encourages them to catch the air, around a central barrier of some sort.
the goal of an anti-drone round is to create as much denied volume for drone proplellers as possible. a string simultaneously denies a much greater segment of the drone's configuration space than a ball projectile because it sweeps a surface-like manifold rather than a line like one.
you don't need a ton of momentum or kinetic energy to snap a rotor and veer the drone off course. a larger bore like a 10 gauge could also be helpful here. the goal is to sweep the greatest possible denied volume with every single shot. >>65227591 that's a very lucky shot.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)20:20:57
>>65228926 killing a drone has different geometry than killing a bird, retard. there are only a few places that will result in a mission kill, namely the rotors and perhaps the camera or some electronics (much more difficult to immediately disable)
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)20:23:44
>>65228949 ok, draw a drone over that bird in a way where none of the rotors or the camera get hit with a pellet