>>25325148(OP) understand metaphysics top-to-bottom. you won't find a more superiour education anywhere else
00
Anonymous06/06/26(Sat)14:07:22
>>25325254 im interested in the rebirth book based on the title, but maybe the title is just listing off an abusrdity
00
Anonymous06/06/26(Sat)15:03:00
>>25325148(OP) Does anyone have a psychology chart or a better Freud one?
00
Anonymous06/06/26(Sat)15:07:38
>>25325148(OP) This is such a weird chart. No Introductory Lectures? No New Introductory Lectures? No Interpretation of Dreams? No Moses and Monotheism? No Three Essays? >Freud by Lear >Civ and its Discontents are good starter choices but after that the chart falls apart
00
Anonymous06/06/26(Sat)15:34:16
>>25325342 >but after that the chart falls apart Everything related to psychology falls apart when you eventually come around and face the fact that it's pseudo science. Come home to astrology, star-child.
>>25325853 Is there any chart about the history, culture, and society of the ancient Greeks? I want to read the Greeks with an idea of the context they lived in
>>25325856 >>25325860 Specifically with that as its end? Not that I know of. You should be able to build a rough image of it yourself just by reading them with an overview as a companion. I liked Durant's Life of Greece quite a bit.
>>25325796 My most recent favorite display of performance art on YouTube was watching Peterson pace around in one of his Etsy blazers in front of an obvious green screen studio mimicking a sterile mental asylum hold doing his typical flanderized pseud-babble about what “Beyond Good and Evil” means (not the book, just the title. Within two minutes you can tell he’s never a single page in his life) for almost 40 whole minutes while shitty AI generated renders of Nietzsche randomly flash in the background. All part of a freemium paid ‘university’ course on the subject btw.
10/10 conservakike griftcore. Nothing but the best slop from Pissraeli Wire.
>>25326931 >no Four Arguments For The Elimination Of Television rip. the latter 1/3rd of Four Arguments is a bunch of tendentious pseudo-medical speculation about how TV makes you nearsighted, but the first 50-75 pages or so are the clearest, most lucid intro to technoskepticism I've ever read
00
Anonymous06/07/26(Sun)15:33:50
>>25325791 low hanging fruit. just as much as why the long face for guenon lmao
>>25325814 sure. >The Enneads >The Unknown God >The Periphyseon >Philosophy as a Rite of Rebirth >Metaphysics (Coomaraswamy) you won't be doing yourself much of a favour with the amount of holes that will be present in your knowledge by limiting yourself to only these. The Enneads and Periphyseon can act as standalones, though, as long as you already understand Plato and Aristotle and are capable of actually thinking.
>>25325839 I won't lie, Hegel is one of the worst starting points if you're looking to get into philosophy. It's extremely difficult to get into him without a basic knowledge of Kant since Hegel's career is based on responding to Kant and his successors. Beiser's book on him (the Routledge guide?) is a very good introduction though, as is Houlate's 'Introduction to Hegel: Freedom, Truth, and History.' Getting into anything like the Phenomenology though without having read at east a little bit of Kant is sort of damning yourself in my opinion. I'd definitely recommend reading Kant's 'Prolegomena' first, it's about 100 pages, also difficult but it will help a LOT. If you do want to go straight into Hegel though, I think probably the best place to start is 'Philosophy of History' which is him interpreting History through the lens of his philosophy, as well as giving you a lot of his ideas on society broadly. It's a good book and much easier than a lot of what he wrote. I don't have a chart but that might help a little bit.