>>25341735 They don't, not regularly at least. Either Sanderson slop or business-related books.
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)20:06:07
>>25341759 >Sanderson slop or business-related books well there you have it, women dont care about that kinda crap. it's like dating a self-proclaimed foodie and trying to impress her with wendy's
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)20:11:51
>>25341772 Perhaps you misunderstand, I am talking about friends who have sex. That is what they are reading. Certainly nothing I would describe as literature. The truth about this poll, is that it was just a list of shit presented to women and they checked the boxes, this is not a questionnaire regarding men that they actually had sex with and what their hobbies actually were. That is, if this poll was truly conducted at all. I see it posed regularly but have never seen a source for it.
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)20:16:33
>>25341772 What are you going to do with all your little books and literary knowledge once Chad rolls around? She might pretend to care for a little while yet, but alas you are just another orbiter. Once Chad happens to walk by she will completely forget your existence.
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)20:18:54
>>25341464(OP) You can still bust into the pages of a good book from the public library anon. That's all you need.
00
Anonymous06/14/26(Sun)20:19:55
>>25341799 you're not supposed to sound aroused when typing this
>>25341464(OP) To do all manner of things, it is a defiance of the whore type of society. Existing in the not-whore spaces is the ultimate expression of power against the oppressor (the great vagina devil whore).
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)03:22:44
>>25341799 A woman's talking "personality" part has nothing to do with the body-doer of the woman. The body-doer of the woman is the motorcycle and the talking "personality" is the sidecar, and it's always a clown in the sidecar.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)03:36:54
>>25341464(OP) personal fulfillment. imagine actually wasting your life chasing foids around
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)04:23:41
>>25341799 I remember the Chad Stacy thing first picking up when I was in high school and now I'm pushing 30. I get that 4chan isn't one person and all that but it makes one reflect
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)05:03:56
>>25341464(OP) judging by the /lit/ userbase it will sensitize you, make you weak and frail, atract you to busy, then penis, and then you will get laid (as a bottom).
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)05:08:06
>>25341529 This. Depends on what you read too. Mein kampf, prose edda, the bible, the quran? Bitches dgaf. They only care abt classic lit like picture of dorian grey, dostoyevsky, tolstoy, jane auesten etc.
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)05:26:56
>>25342798 What percentage of fuckable women are familiar with classic Russian literature
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)06:14:04
>>25341506 >tfw you can't plow her fields because you were taught how to read
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)10:10:25
>>25342829 Most humanities students. Don’t get me wrong they don’t read them but they larp so that’s a way into a convo
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)10:41:11
Getting laid is for animals
00
Anonymous06/15/26(Mon)14:18:57
>>25341464(OP) Actively talking about literature works against getting you laid. When you talk about books with a woman you are meant to pretend listening as she tells you about the shitty characters in the latest fantasy chicklit she's collecting. You are supposed to smile and go "m-hm" and "whoa cool" at the right moment. It's the first test of patience to prep you for the talk about shit like her ex, her slut phase, that time with a dog/nigger and so on. You get pussy in between so you know when to quit