>>1518893 Thus the need to deport illegals. Simple as.
00
Anonymous06/10/26(Wed)01:03:45
>>1518895 No, Republicanism is rooted in ensuring a robust, interracial democracy.
We won't let those filthy libs destroy the CSA's history. Give them the vote!
00
Anonymous06/10/26(Wed)02:52:42
>>1518896 >gets so assblasted he takes his seething to an unrelated thread damn, you're gonna be fuming about that for weeks, huh? looking forward to you crying your dalit eyes out over it a month from now.
00
Anonymous06/10/26(Wed)02:53:32
>>1518896 So, you think race is a convincing argument at this point? Latin people are the ancestors of Europeans too.
00
Aristotle post from chaos06/10/26(Wed)22:23:18
>>1518893 >helicopters use gas >gas prices are based on consumption >so less helicopters means lower gas prices, QED
>>1518894 >>Checkmate gaytheist liberals lose again
SAY, ALL CAPS CO-COCK CONSUMER, asgaytheist liberals, we need to address this logic
>>1518893 >helicopters use gas >gas prices are based on consumption >so less helicopters means lower gas prices, QED
now under tRumpian logic, which is a form ofNon-Aristotelian logic,is a system of reasoning that reject one or more foundational axioms of classical (Aristotelian) logic. Classical logic is built on strict binaries (e.g., true/false) and the Law of Non-Contradiction (a statement cannot be both true and false). Non-Aristotelian systems offer more flexible frameworks to model degrees of truth, paradoxes, and changing information. tRump is playing 3-D ementia chess here
00
Anonymous06/10/26(Wed)22:50:09
>>1519059 you seem booty bothered over my unassailable logic. Instead of spouting a bunch of shit, lets actually address the facts
>helicopters use gas This is 100% true for US helicopters. >gas prices are based on consumption everyone seems to understand that more things using product = more demand for product = product sells for more, but I'll entertain a schizo rant on why more consumption of a limited resource wouldn't
>so less helicopters means lower gas prices, QED indeed.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)00:32:58
Essentially what happened here is that the United States gave Iran multiple options/OPPORTUNITIES to correct their mistakes over the strait. Iran chose to get missile striked by the United States because Iran understood they were doing wrong and continued to do wrong.
Nope. Consumption, demand, and availability. I mean for fucks sake, WHY does Consumption increase prices? Because it increases the demand and reduces availability. You're only looking at one cherry picked variable, your logic fails, you are a charlatan. Now for the sake of argument.
>So less helicopters means lower gas prices.
Also assumes the gas used by helicopters could not be used by other things. If you don't fly a helicopter and walk instead, you're saving fuel. If you don't use a helicopter and use a tank instead, you're burning more fuel.
Less helicopters means less helicopters, nothing else. You are essentially arguing if you crush chips you get more chips. Genuinely cannot tell if this is satire, maga retards legit believe giving Walmart a multi-billion dollar company, and a multi-million dollar mom and pop store the same tax cuts is somehow closing the competitive gap and not giving the big corporations a massive advantage, so it's hard to tell.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)05:04:19
>>1519075 >If you don't fly a helicopter and walk instead... You need to tell the military this, they're spending trillions
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)15:33:14
>>1519087 Don't act like this is my absurd scenario, that is literally what the person I am responding to is suggesting implicitly by arguing not using helicopters saves gas. You have a transportation need. You don't use helicopters. To meet that need without using gas, you walk.
If you're the Anon I replied to, then fuck you for not even understanding your own argument you stupid bitch.
If not, disregard.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)15:38:06
>>1519115 >You have a transportation need. You don't use helicopters. To meet that need without using gas, you walk. I'm telling you the military doesn't understand this You could be saving us billions of dollars in fuel costs Just talk to the generals, please
00
Colonel Blimp06/11/26(Thu)18:09:50
>>1519075 > Genuinely cannot tell if this is satire,
welcome to the tRumpian age.
I suggest giving tRump a big meal of Taco Bell refried beans, attaching a payload onto him, and as he's already so full of hot air, he has to lift, but he can use the gas expelled from his anus to propell toward the destination with the payload