I saw online the 0.03 megapixel camera and was kinda curious so i snapped a few pics and modified them in gimp to reach a similar effect, including the resolution. I honestly having quite a bit of fun with these and i'm enjoying the results quite much
>>4500532(OP) >remove the ability to pixel peep >suddenly photos look more interesting Well that was straightforward
00
Anonymous03/12/26(Thu)16:43:33
>>4500539 >say something that is totally untrue but helps you feel better about how envious you are of people who can afford nicer cameras >in a totally unrelated thread that is just about sharing pics, not your perpetual seething at literally anyone with a job and properly managed finances Its funny how your exact behavior is common to cameras, guns, bikes, cars, and electric guitars. All trailer park ass hobbies with a bit of overlap with the upper class. Might as well have been >OP: I took my miata out today >seething poorfag: WOW AMAZING HOW NOT HAVING THE ABILITY TO GO FASTER THAN MY CIVIC MAKES DRIVING ACTUALLY ENJOYABLE (DO YOU HEAR THAT, YOU MONEY WASTING BOURGIE BITCHES?)
>>4500585 I’m working three cases at the law firm and have family in bomb shelters, and the first thing i see on 4chan is some poorfag cow trying to cope with his shitty camera. What do you think?
>>4500540 Are you right there schitzy? >>4500614 >moans about nophoto >posts photo that doesn't even fit criteria for the thread digishit thread is over there anon
00
Anonymous03/13/26(Fri)15:29:32
>>4500540 He’s right, you know. All “pixel peeping” means is “other people succeeded in life where I failed”.
>>4500614 I wanted to try a green palette but the results really didnt work out very much. The purple one made the picture completely unreadable. This blue/red palette seems to work for quite a lot of stuff instead but i really know nothing about color theory so i dont really know why.
00
Anonymous03/13/26(Fri)18:22:12
>>4500614 unfortunatly i dont have any real project... i really like photography but i really lack of ideas or inspiration and every pic i take i feel like it's boring. At least editing photos like this is fun.
>>4500723 In Gimp, Image/Mode/Indexed with options "Generate optimum palette" and "Maximum number of colors" 16. Nothing fancy.
(Old Vongoaivi turf hut at summer 2015. Replaced with a new one.)
00
Anonymous03/22/26(Sun)15:48:03
>>4500649 i quite like this for some reason. makes me want to mess with game boy resolutions and super small palettes myself
>>4500744 did you know Gimp gives different results if you set an opened image to indexed color, or if you paste the image into a work space already set to indexed? at least if you're using a fixed palette but it's probably the same with generated ones. it's been years and they never fixed it
>>4501703 If a thing is pasted into an already indexed space I'd expect the thing gets converted indexed using the existing palette, whatever it is. If that's not what happens I'd call it a bug.
(Some wild snowmen on their way to mischief. This time only 8 colors.)
>>4501768 1.4MP might be the output size, but you'll rarely see a thermal sensor with more than 640*512. They're hard to make and fall under ITAR restrictions.
>>4501778 I feel like this photo would be better with higher resolution most of these thermal photos of yours failed >>4503212 except this one, you nailed it. the subject is well defined and the color grade of the sky works really well in an “aesthetic” sort of way. some of your preceding attempts were too abstract to be photos of “anything” and when there is a subject the colors are so intense it’s a little garish. >>4503211 I have mixed feelings about this one. I like the subject surrounded by so much negative space but the low resolution really does hurt it in my opinion, just a little more definition wouldn’t hurt. the subject feels like a blob…
I mean duh it’s the low res thread but still I think there needs to be a lower limit on how little resolution there is to a photo before it’s no longer working.
>>4501768 >>4503461 So you were using a phone with a built in thermal camera? >>4500532(OP) What’s the 0.03 megapixel camera you used here?
00
Anonymous05/25/26(Mon)16:45:51
>>4500532(OP) >>4510734 >What’s the 0.03 megapixel camera you used here? Was it this one: https://www.pixlesscamera.com/ https://petapixel.com/2025/01/09/0-03-megapixel-pixless-camera-captures-charming-pixel-art-photos/
00
Anonymous06/02/26(Tue)10:13:19
>>4511154 nope i just took a photo with my small sony alpha5000 and then edited it in gimp by lowering the resolution to 0.03megapixel and reducing the colors to a simple palette.
I too wanted the pixlesscamera cause i think it's a nice and funny thing but i refuse to pay 100€ for a 3d printed junk.
i'd rather pay 20 or 30 a toy camera and circuit bend it at that point.
00
Anonymous06/02/26(Tue)18:33:42
>>4512431 >i'd rather pay 20 or 30 a toy camera and circuit bend it at that point. are there any good toy cameras for that in that price range?
>>4512470 Toy cameras have "character", up to you if a still from a budget crashcam is "good". Plenty in that range at ChinkExpress, including shipping. At least for EU, dunno about Tariffstan. Search Ali for G6 Thumb Camera or toy camera, and make sure whatever you find can take photos instead squirting water or whatever...