>Your Mbti >Do you think that things like red and hard exist only as labels used to describe and categorize objects? >Do you think things like red and hard exist in their own right, outside of the things they are used to describe? >(Optional) Do you think people that see things differently from you are stupid? >(Secret) What is your sexual Orientation?
Turbie-Wurbie's Cutesy Test Link m Compilation! UwU https://pastebin.com/6YSzm68D
Anon's Guide to Jungian Typology https://pastebin.com/XJvFYQzT
Easy Patcheezie's Rundown on Jung's Depth Psychology https://pastebin.com/1PYUQTpP
Exploration into Enneagram https://wiki.personality-database.com/books/enneagram https://ennealib.carrd.co/
Syntax of Love (We need a better link for this, volunteers welcome(save us Patchoulie!) https://web.archive.org/web/20230608184321/https://psychosophy.ru/books/sintaksislubvi/sintaksislubvi1.html
Those threads are getting gayer and gayer >pride month Oh right, that. I just pulled a massive introverted move and completely ignored its existence. And I'm proud of it! I'm integrating the opposite attitude, see?
00
Anonymous06/08/26(Mon)16:02:30
Sorry about being gay and sexually aggressive towards anon. I didn't mean to do that. I thought anon was a girl.
>>84770236 Sorry, I included the Zestiest philospher of all time in this one. It was inevitable really. I've been putting him off because of the likelyness he'd keep us up all night with his super men, but if Joong's mentioning him that means his spirit is getting unleashed.
Also I probably should have asked for Thus Spoke Zestythustra since I think now that it'd look better, but the AI refuses to make that edit now.
>>84770212(OP) Bored enough to answer today, also hey it's a literal PT-inspired set of questions.
>>Your Mbti INTP, INTJ, ENTP, ENFP, INFJ, ENTP again Or a Jungian EN(T) who likes to invest in Feeling, sometimes. Thinking is already min-maxed enough you know. >>Do you think that things like red and hard exist only as labels used to describe and categorize objects? The words themselves are indeed just labels. They mean nothing on their own without context. Failure to abide to this viewpoint produces people such as certain anons who cannot read for shit. This becomes extremely obvious if you are multilingual especially, much gets lost in translation because the meaning of certain words doesn't always transfer in another language when you don't know what was the original cultural/historical context for a specific term. >>Do you think things like red and hard exist in their own right, outside of the things they are used to describe? It would be pretty much the only way to explain archetypes. So let's say that it applies to things that aren't too specific, only "archetypal". >>(Optional) Do you think people that see things differently from you are stupid? I will go with "differently intelligent". >>(Secret) What is your sexual Orientation? Magical Girls
>>84770359 Nice guys don't get the girls, 3D or 2D ones.
>>84770354 Are you ignoring "The Gay Science"? Thought everyone knew this purely from the title alone.
00
Anonymous06/08/26(Mon)16:37:01
>>84770455 >Are you ignoring "The Gay Science"? Too easy, what's the point of gathering low hanging fruit? I thought we were more sophisticated than that here. Ecce Homo might be one to keep in the back pocket mind you.
>>84770491 Of course, but then I fuck it up (on purpose).
00
Anonymous06/08/26(Mon)16:40:17
sorry, you're not getting rid of me with your gay psyop shit fuck trannies fuck faggots fuck women
that is all
00
Anonymous06/08/26(Mon)16:42:13
>>84770499 >Of course, but then I fuck it up (on purpose). why
00
Anonymous06/08/26(Mon)16:46:54
>>84770522 Can't say I know for sure, but I'm all fun and games until shit gets too real. Though, unlike most anons on this board, I figured I might not need a gf at all. So I'm here only for the MBTI threads and other hobby boards.
00
Anonymous06/08/26(Mon)16:48:27
>>84768654 >what's good about it It was a joke; that happens to be how tall I am.
>>84770212(OP) >Your Mbti ESFP-T >Do you think that things like red and hard exist only as labels used to describe and categorize objects? That tracks. >Do you think things like red and hard exist in their own right, outside of the things they are used to describe? I guess red could be concretely defined as a specific range of frequencies of visible light. Hardness on the other hand is really relative to whatever you're talking about. A mattress that's too hard to sleep on comfortably is probably going to be too soft to stop a rifle round. >(Optional) Do you think people that see things differently from you are stupid? Absolutely not. >(Secret) What is your sexual Orientation? Bi with a heavy leaning towards other girls.
00
Anonymous06/08/26(Mon)16:50:14
>heartfag confirmed bad boy biggest lore in years
00
Anonymous06/08/26(Mon)16:58:05
>>84770354 Speaking of this pic, the Nietzsche's bust in the background is a very nice touch. Jung described it in the seminar I'm reading and said something about being shaped around a metaphor involving an eagle and a serpent(I'm not seeing it at all but ok)
>>84770212(OP) >Your Mbti INTJ-T >Do you think that things like red and hard exist only as labels used to describe and categorize objects? What? No the concept of "red" or "hard" does not literally exist, those are adjectives that describe things that exist. >Do you think things like red and hard exist in their own right, outside of the things they are used to describe? You would need to be retarded and read plato to believe that 'hard' exist physically. >(Optional) Do you think people that see things differently from you are stupid? No I think that people with low IQ are stupid. >(Secret) What is your sexual Orientation? I am a straight male sissy.
00
Anonymous06/08/26(Mon)17:18:04
Kinda want to re-read actual PT now, but I guess anon will eventually dump every paragraph anyways, that counts as re-read.
00
Anonymous06/08/26(Mon)17:21:46
>>84770662 INFP-T here, I feel the same, apart from the giant meteor or shooting myself. Don't give in man. There's plenty of time for things to improov.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElZOmv-44Xk
00
Anonymous06/08/26(Mon)17:22:21
>>84770559 >being your age and having no self-insight is this an entp thing
00
Anonymous06/08/26(Mon)17:29:30
>>84770860 Maybe? >extraversion >thinking over feeling That does mean you don't pay much attention to the realm of feeling and introversion before actually acting. It happens after the fact. But that being said, I'm describing stuff that hasn't been happening in years now.
00
Anonymous06/08/26(Mon)17:47:00
>Your Mbti INFJ >Do you think that things like red and hard exist only as labels used to describe and categorize objects? They are subjective and would not exist without human observation and categorization. >Do you think things like red and hard exist in their own right, outside of the things they are used to describe? No. See above. >(Optional) Do you think people that see things differently from you are stupid? No. People can have objectively poor reasoning or logic, but someone disagreeing with me does not imply they are stupid. I am sure there are plenty of holes in the way I see things, but you can't check yourself on everything. >(Secret) What is your sexual Orientation? I am a heteroflexible, but could only be in a straight relationship I think.
00
Anonymous06/08/26(Mon)17:52:45
>>84771044 >would not exist without human observation and categorization. It would still exist and you are forgetting that other intelligent life could categorize it as similar.
00
Anonymous06/08/26(Mon)18:02:17
>>84764413 Ooh, martyr me martyr me with Stage Magick! https://youtu.be/eJjvChERPrE Ladybug Decode La Petit Mal Mort Wort
>>84770571 >Bi with a heavy leaning towards other girls. has a boyfriend and talks about how she sucks his cock in front of her family btw, lesbian tho baka The kids are not alright
>>84771087 Fair point. Should have described it as general intelligence, versus human intelligence, as that works better. I think the way I see it is, what is considered hard or red may change based on the viewer. Say there's an element that is extraordinarily hard. That is the only element an intelligence has interacted with. Then, that intelligence interacts with an element that has slightly more give, but would still be considered hard to someone who had touched a variety of material. To the intelligence, due to their reference point of one having touched the first element, the second would be considered soft, even if it objectively wasn't to you, yourself. The universe in itself does not recognize something to be hard or soft, it takes an intelligence to label it so. Colors aren't seen the same way even across all humans, as well. Vietnamese, for example, has a single word for both blue and green. I'm open to hearing another side to this, though.
Well that was a fun adventure, realised I was starting to develop ass pimples so went on a quest for slop. Failed miserably and ended up with chicken breasts and broccoli. Oh well, at least I got donuts too so it wasn't a complete wash. Bed time already I suppose. I wonder what sort of coffee I should get from the nice man on the way to work.
>>84770212(OP) >Your Mbti >Do you think that things like red and hard exist only as labels used to describe and categorize objects? Yes, we're all just vibrating orbs pushing each other apart in the end. >Do you think things like red and hard exist in their own right, outside of the things they are used to describe? No, that would be pure mysticism >(Optional) Do you think people that see things differently from you are stupid? Not stupid necessarily, but it does worry me to think we live in the same world, where two completely different things can be obvious to both of us, and that never being resolved. >(Secret) What is your sexual Orientation? I'm straight
>>84771087 >other intelligent life Makes me wonder how hard it would be to explain our colours to an alien who only sees in a different part of the electromagnetic spectrum from us. If we could actually communicate with them we could probably reach a shared understanding, but actually even knowing what they can see sounds like a hassle. We need machines and science to know that flowers can be ultraviolet coloured, which makes us basically colourblind compared to mice, birds and insects. Imagine dealing with a creature that just sees straight through paper or something. What a nightmare! Hopefully if they come here first they'll do the hard part of figuring out what we can see in relation to them on our behalf.
>Whether a function is differentiated or not can easily be recognized from its strength, stability, consistency, reliability, and adaptedness. But inferiority in a function is often not so easy to recognize or to describe. >An essential criterion is its lack of self-sufficiency and consequent dependence on people and circumstances, its disposing us to moods and crotchetiness, its unreliable use, its suggestible and labile character. The inferior function always puts us at a disadvantage because we cannot direct it, but are rather its victims. That sounds easy in theory, but in actual practice it's another story. Also "technically part of PT but not really because it's one of the four papers attached at the end".
00
Anonymous06/08/26(Mon)20:28:37
>>84772431 Yeah that sounds like me when it comes to pretty much anything basically. I always did say I have a very low level of individualization. Is it possible to have four inferior functions? Well of course we know it's possible, but what proportion of people would you say suffer from this condition? Maybe even having a type is aspirational.
00
Anonymous06/08/26(Mon)20:37:18
>>84772474 >Is it possible to have four inferior functions? In theory yes, but at that point you would be closer to a LLM than human. > but what proportion of people would you say suffer from this condition? Good question. I have a feeling there is at least an amount of people, like 1/5 of general population at best whose functions are basically all inferior. Majority should fit in one function+a relatively developed auxiliary. And maybe there is a minority who pushed beyond that and differentiated very well both their superior function, an auxiliary, and maybe reached to the second one. Like a 1/10 case here.
00
Anonymous06/08/26(Mon)20:51:13
>>84772411 Can you start a youtube and tell more stories?
00
Anonymous06/08/26(Mon)22:15:49
So do I really have to lie about my type to avoid being mistreated by all the regulars?
00
Anonymous06/08/26(Mon)22:19:02
If you keep posting you'll be identified as a regular because there are less people that use the thread than total personality types and then Anon scary ghost reggy will bully you and live in your walls
00
Anonymous06/08/26(Mon)22:31:02
I'm never noticed or remembered. There's a few posters who I like to interact here when I see them. Some of the people here are mean though.
>>84771247 I was disappointed in later entries in the franchise, though that does look pretty cool.
>>84771428 That is a VERY distorted retelling of the story.
00
Anonymous06/09/26(Tue)00:05:58
>>84770217 >He literally just said neitszche is an extreme nominalist No he didn't.
00
Anonymous06/09/26(Tue)00:28:43
>>84773823 I don't want to say because if I talk about them everyone else will also want to like them. It's like a band when no one else knows about them. Even if they deserve to be known far and wide in my ready for that yet.
00
Anonymous06/09/26(Tue)01:43:01
lol at heartfag's bad boy larp. he is the nicest and most moral reg we've ever had
00
Anonymous06/09/26(Tue)01:46:47
Mistreat a reggy today for only bennies on the dollar your rent will go towards spitting in [regular]'s mouths
Yes, the one with all the mouths. That one is my favorite to cruise for bruising from
Nobody here has any facade we can't all see through effectively rendering it useless
00
Anonymous06/09/26(Tue)03:40:49
Unless the point of the facade is to be seen through in order for you to miss the facade behind it
00
Anonymous06/09/26(Tue)04:58:02
>>84770212(OP) >>Your Mbti infp-a >>Do you think that things like red and hard exist only as labels used to describe and categorize objects? dunno what this is >>Do you think things like red and hard exist in their own right, outside of the things they are used to describe? dunno what this is >>(Optional) Do you think people that see things differently from you are stupid? no >>(Secret) What is your sexual Orientation? hetero/straight
00
Anonymous06/09/26(Tue)05:28:14
>>84775447 Been there [pun]'d'at Trip and Grace's marriage in SPIDER SHAMBLES
>>84770212(OP) INx(oxo) >Do you think that things like red and hard exist only as labels used to describe and categorize objects? Hard, yes; Red, no. >Do you think things like red and hard exist in their own right, outside of the things they are used to describe? Red, yes; Hard, no. >Do you think people that see things differently from you are stupid? Pretty much, yeah. >(Secret) Virgin But more seriously, Fifth House Sagittarius holds Venus, Seventh House Aquarius and Eighth House Pieces are empty >We need a better link for this What's wrong with it?
>>84770212(OP) >>Your Mbti INFJ >>Do you think that things like red and hard exist only as labels used to describe and categorize objects? It's like a pointer in programming, but pointing this out doesn't really say anything consequential imo >>Do you think things like red and hard exist in their own right, outside of the things they are used to describe? If it's outside of what it's describing then I'm guessing ur just talking about the language? I would say it exists but only as words that people have acknowledged to identify the color red(the light frequencies) and hardness >>(Optional) Do you think people that see things differently from you are stupid? I mean not really There's a billion reasons why that would happen that don't necessarily point to them being stupid. Some even point to them being smarter >>(Secret) What is your sexual Orientation? I'm straight Well, as straight as anybody who likes femdom backside stuff, which idk how straight that is