>Your MBTI >When do you get takeout/delivery? >(Optional) What is your main reason for doing so? >(Optional) When did you last get food poisoning >(Optional) Do you have a "comfort food"? >(Secret) Tastiest bodily fluid?
Turbie-Wurbie's Cutesy Test Link Compilation! UwU https://pastebin.com/6YSzm68D
Anon's Guide to Jungian Typology https://pastebin.com/XJvFYQzT
Easy Patcheezie's Rundown on Jung's Depth Psychology https://pastebin.com/1PYUQTpP
>>84806407(OP) >Q1 Usually when I'm emotionally exhausted, overwhelmed by decision fatigue, or deep in a project and forget that food requires planning. Or when I don't have food at home and I place a quick meal's importance over pinchin' bennies. >Q1 A) Convenience, but also comfort. Sometimes I want nourishment without spending all my available energy obtaining it. Sometimes I have enough change left over from the REAL necessities like DUDE WEED LMAO
>Opt Long enough ago that I've mostly stopped thinking about it, but recently enough that I still side-eye suspicious leftovers. I have histamine processing issues because of MTHFR gene mutation so I'm already basically allergic to leftovers.
>Opt Soup and salad with breadsticks. It's humble, reliable, and feels like being cared for without demanding anything from me. I could also drink straight vinegar so the salad is a vehicle for the dressing, the real craving.
>Vriska Serket Tears shed after surviving something difficult. Not because of the flavor---because of what they mean. Blood/Ichor for similar reasonings. And they say fallen Empyreans don't season they food ! Pfffftchhh I'd crunch some eyeshadow up over my chicken before leaving it fffUUUUCKING RAAAAWWWW
>>84806469 Another hidden mystery, unlocked by the memelords!
00
Anonymous06/12/26(Fri)19:52:41
>>84806407(OP) >When do you get takeout/delivery? Never unless Its the only option, and I haven't eaten for at least 2 days. >(Optional) What is your main reason for doing so? I'm very hungry. >(Optional) When did you last get food poisoning About 6 years ago, first time I ever got it from 7/11 food and I thought I was going to die. >(Optional) Do you have a "comfort food"? Not really food isn't all that important to me >(Secret) Tastiest bodily fluid? Anything that comes out of lilacs vagina
00
Anonymous06/12/26(Fri)19:52:55
More faggot stuff masquerading as a general, fuck off to discord or >>>/lgbt/
Going back over the last thread, it looks like basically all the replies to the OP were from nominalists. Only possible exceptions being Curezette and this other INTP who was certainly saying something I didn't understand. >>84778773 Anyway it was like 7 or 8 nominalists and one maybe realist. Strange considering how caustic and accusatory the initial reaction to nominalism appeared in the previous thead. I'm guessing either they're a petulant minority or just don't like answering OP questions. Yes I will be trying to get into the habit of actually going through and reading the replies to the OP.
Also of note, of the actually coherent answers to the sexual orientation question I got 6 straights and a bi woman, zero gays. Considering the contents of these threads I think that might also say something about the sort of person that doesn't answer OP questions, and could even be extrapolated to the nature of realists. Fascinating! Now that I've muddied the water it will be interesting to see how things proceed.
>>84806407(OP) >Your MBTI INFP >When do you get takeout/delivery? I've been spending far too much time in greggs recently. I don't have the self esteem for anything else. Thought I had food poisoning today from eating some old chicken breast from the fridge, but I think it's just a cold. >Tastiest bodily fluid? Google seems to thing snot counts so I'll go with that. I'm a bit of a booger fiend traditionally.
>>84806764 I haven't been to the dentist in years so I wouldn't know. I think I'll go to an ear person first though.
>>84806867 Thanks for reminding me of a future thread theme feat cowboy joong https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFK3xuCD3Ak
00
Anonymous06/12/26(Fri)20:57:00
>>84806867 but yeah still that just makes it even sillier if not a single realist was willing to stick their neck above the parapet and instead they all just insist on screeching from the shadows. But what can you expect from a bunch of magical thinkers?
>>84807008 Guess you could say Nominalism is the ego ITT then. Makes it twice as good if you assume that most of us would be introverts generating a collective extraversion! As foretold.
00
Anonymous06/12/26(Fri)21:26:04
>>84806407(OP) INxoxo >When do you get takeout/delivery? When others are and and i'm feeling friendly, or feel like i should join in for some reason and don't mind too much doing so. >(Secret) Blood by far. >>84806832 >other intp That guy is an ultranominalist, so the one that replied, and Heartfag is also a nominalist. Everybody else who replied to the OP with a coherent answer was more of a realist than a nominalist, yourself included. It was a leading question, but if you look at the response to the sexual orientation question, you can get a good idea of what's really in the gut. And the gut is what matters here, as it is a gut question, not so much a head one. >of the actually coherent answers to the sexual orientation question Just because it's incoherent doesn't mean it's incomprehensible, nor necessarily disherent: Like how snow will melt on asphalt but stick to grass. Would a little detour into astrology not be a fun distraction for you?
00
Anonymous06/12/26(Fri)21:30:45
>>84807285 >Just because it's incoherent doesn't mean it's incomprehensible It makes it very difficult to plug in as either an n or a y on a spreadsheet, so it might as well not exist
00
Anonymous06/12/26(Fri)21:41:38
>>84806867 You answered 2/3 nominalist, raw. If we, as we should, weight the final question, then you answered 3/4 nominalist. But personally, i would weight the final question a little more, putting you at 4/5, although i admit that may be overweighting, so we'll stick with 3/4.
And going by that, rather than saying most are realist, i would be more right in saying they're just more realist than they realize.
00
Anonymous06/12/26(Fri)21:50:47
>>84807424 There's such a thing as moderate realism though. And I think we should draw a hard line between wordism and realism. Spoken word isn't a 1:1 translation of concepts/forms.
Anyways, the entire opposition is one-sided so it's not a matter of how much you align with one or the other, because they negate each other.
My direct answer to the entire question would be: Empirical world is real, and affects the "world of forms" because it's "imperfections" effectively result in different forms. World of forms is also real and affects the physical world of course.
Reality itself is the result of both things, but we must be precise: Our mind can deduce the forms(not necessarily in a rational manner, they can be intuit'd too) and our senses see the empirical world.
00
Anonymous06/12/26(Fri)21:51:19
>>84807326 I answered more realist than nominalist, much more if you read my elaborationpost. It's just i'm selective is all.
And really you could include the stupid question, thereby making it a fraction of 5 without overweighting, or as fraction of 6 if you're alright with ties and an extra weight somewhere.
00
Anonymous06/12/26(Fri)22:34:40
[44] Another leading figure in this school was Stilpon of Megara, about whom the following characteristic anecdote is related. One day Stilpon came to Athens and saw on the Acropolis the wondrous statue of Pallas Athene made by Phidias. A true Megarian, he remarked that it was not the daughter of Zeus but of Phidias. This jest catches the whole spirit of Megarian thinking, for Stilpon taught that generic concepts are without reality and objective validity. Anyone, therefore, who speaks of "man" speaks of nobody, because he is designating (neither this nor that). Plutarch ascribes to him the statement (one thing can affirm nothing concerning [the nature of] another). 12 The teaching of Antisthenes was very similar. The oldest exponent of this type of propositional thinking seems to have been Antiphon of Rhamnos, a sophist and contemporary of Socrates. One of his propositions runs: "A man who perceives long objects neither sees the length with his eyes nor can perceive it with his mind." 13 The denial of the substantiality of generic concepts follows directly from this proposition. Naturally the whole position of Platonic ideas is undermined by this type of thinking, for with Plato it is just the ideas that have eternal and immutable validity, while the "real" and the "many" are merely their fugitive reflections. From the realist standpoint, the Cynic-Megarian critique breaks down generic concepts into purely sophisticated and descriptive nomina lacking any substantiality, and lays the accent on the individual thing.
I dunno how many extracts I can just write jung is a sad boring nerd with bad opinions after. Maybe I should just admit I am once again losing interest in whatever it is he is even trying to say. Take me back to the church guys!
00
Anonymous06/12/26(Fri)22:41:43
>>84807900 Don't forget this the man who cured mentally ill girls with his "long object that you cannot perceive the length of, nor can perceive it with your mind"
This has to be the best dick joke I've heard after Freud's
00
Anonymous06/12/26(Fri)22:44:08
Also by sticking thin pointed objects in their necks for funsies.
>>84807900 >A top guy in the Megarian school was Stilpon of Megara >He said it was gay to jack off to anime babes because they were drawn by men >This """joke""" encapsulates the entire way of Megarian thinking >This is because Stilpon thought that, uhh, stereotypes aren't real? >Therefore if you talk in vague terms like "normal human being" you aren't actually talking about anyone. >Antisthenes was kinda like this, yeah just bringing him up again for that one line >The first guy to talk like this appears to been Antiphon of Rhamnos who was one of the guys Plato didn't like talking to his philosophy dad >One of his things he said was, "If a man sees something long, he doesn't actually see how long it is, and he can't see it in his brain either" ????? >Thinking stereotypes aren't real comes directly from this idea?????? >Obviously, all these guys seem to make it sound like Plato was retarded >From the retard perspective however, Cynical Megarianism breaks things down into little tiny bits that don't actually mean anything, and emphasises individual things which is bad apparently? I guess it would put them out of a job or something, and besides, who actually sees things like that?
>>84807968 I didn't get the joke, maybe it's because I'm not as obsessed with dicks as Jung or the Ancient Greeks. Thanks for putting lobotomised women and girls being taken advantage of by smarmy swiss charlatans while they can't perceive what's going on in my head though.
Actually, the modern conception of extraversion and introversion in terms of "energy" is flipped backwards!
The extravert conscious attitude is to spend his libido into the object, but at rest, when he needs to "recharge", he ought to let the libido flow into inner images.
The introvert is the opposite: libido is spent within, but at rest he must let it flow into objects.
Of course, you must add that their opposite attitude isn't adapted, weaker, and all of that. So it will likely not translate into a social behavior either way. The objects of the introvert might be inanimate ones for instance, or his most trusted companions.
>>84808470 How it actually goes: >ENFJ: *says some stuff about how cool detectives are, barely solves shit* >INFJ: *for the lack of better options, she stares at random stuff and figures out the solution, just wants to go home*
00
Anonymous06/12/26(Fri)23:54:24
>>84806407(OP) >>Your MBTI ESFP-T >>When do you get takeout/delivery? When I feel like it. >>(Optional) What is your main reason for doing so? More expedient and convenient. >>(Optional) When did you last get food poisoning Never had it. >>(Optional) Do you have a "comfort food"? Fried chicken, mashed potatoes, corn, and biscuits.
00
Anonymous06/13/26(Sat)02:33:31
>>84806584 >eat pets No. I don't want to eat pets. I want to sleep in a tent under the moonlight.
00
Anonymous06/13/26(Sat)02:43:23
>>84806407(OP) >Your MBTI INTP >When do you get takeout/delivery? When I really want to and I couldn't be bothered to cook and can't deal with another day of frozen food >When did you last get food poisoning 1 year ago from sandwich shop ran by immigrants >Do you have a comfort food Donuts The expensive ones that taste and feel like cake but are soft like donuts with creamy but chewy icing >Tastiest body fluid Juices from seared muscle
00
Anonymous06/13/26(Sat)04:13:42
>>>84802624 You don't have to remind me. I loathe panjungians and correlationists.
00
Anonymous06/13/26(Sat)05:55:00
>>84809903 Who doesn't. They don't deserve to have "Jungians" in their title. The whole view only works if you believe that all typology systems are describing exactly the same things from the same perspective, but you will quickly find out that's not a viable position.
/mbti/ is deep diving in the unconscious rn, it seems.
00
Anonymous06/13/26(Sat)08:19:56
https://youtu.be/APQoMwCIOwU
00
Anonymous06/13/26(Sat)08:32:52
Jvng really went from astrology to the swastika and nazism/fascism, then into black magic in the blink of an eye. Gotta love how half of it is boring lore dump stuff, but the other half is pure unfiltered kino.
00
Anonymous06/13/26(Sat)09:30:15
Are these threads as active as they were three or four years ago? I stopped posting because of the constant fighting and drama
00
Anonymous06/13/26(Sat)09:36:23
It's all kino if you understand the context.
00
Anonymous06/13/26(Sat)09:36:27
>There are certain psychological concepts which are based upon the logic of facts, the fact of the introverted type for instance, or the libido concept, and they are in a way effective. You can make them evident. Whereas an intuitive concept is an attempt at a concept; it is a provisional formulation. Sometimes it is a mere symbol for something you don't know. Just as an intuitive type doesn't create a fact-he creates the ghost of a fact. >Now, of course, if one happens to be an intuitive, one likes to handle the results of one's own intuition as facts. For instance, with the telescope of your intuition you gaze on the top of a mountain, and there you see a little stone, and then you assume that you have been on the top of that mountain. And curiously enough, you leave a trace-a tin can-so although you have not been there, you have spoiled the show for the poor sensation type who is actually climbing up. S type bulli feat. ghosts and tin cans coming out of nowhere.
>>84811293 Sometimes there is activity, but not the good kind as you can guess. There are some attempts to do something more Jvngian at least.
00
Anonymous06/13/26(Sat)09:41:42
>>84811293 there's no drama because everyone left it's just heartfag and centaur now
00
Anonymous06/13/26(Sat)10:14:24
>>84808528 Intuition isn't magical, Heartfag. INFJs would get stuck on cases like anyone else
>>84811473 Canonically 50:50. Which brings me to an interesting point: an intuitive, unless perfectly lacking in self-awareness, would probably try to move into an auxiliary function quickly enough in their lives specifically to raise their attitude above chasing coin flips. I wonder if this rule would hold true for a majority of cases.
00
Anonymous06/13/26(Sat)10:49:39
Fittingly enough, this comes right next.
>An intuition is by no means nothing, but it is not the fact which many people assume it to be; they say they know all about something but they have only glanced at it. The opinion may be right; if you are optimistic the chances are about fifty-fifty, but one is often 50 percent mistaken. >An intuition amounts to nothing if it has no positive results, and it has not always positive results. One thing is certain; if you have an intuition about a thing, you have not been there. You still have to make the way. >So an intuitive concept is just a shot at something which we cannot grasp or formulate otherwise than by such a lucky shot; it is like trying to hit the famous silver thread suspended in a cloud. You don't see it in the cloud, but you aim at it and you might cut the thread by your arrow. That is intuition. >Now, an intuitive concept is necessary, it is unavoidable; but it is not a welcome thing really.
I really wanted to quote the part about "women are spiders" when describing the difference between Logos and Eros, but it's L O N G. Very kino though. That was the original context of the quote [Jung claims that those terms are intuitive concepts, unlike something like the introverted type or the concept of libido. I suppose then he's trying to say he never observed Logos/Eros on its own, only a "ghost" produced by some facts]
00
Anonymous06/13/26(Sat)11:52:54
>An anonymous writer who signs herself Mrs. Spider-web Funny lady
00
Anonymous06/13/26(Sat)13:16:04
> It is a most curious fact that Nietzsche, an intuitive, should overestimate the body to such an extent. Of course, the body is extraordinarily important but that is an overrating. And it is quite interesting that he calls it a "mighty lord," for that word is taken literally, one could say, from the texts of the Upanishads and the Tantric philosophy. No look it makes perfect sense. You can also see it in sensation types, with V.F. saying they would end up being the most interested into all the fantastic sects and cults of whatever random spiritual/ethereal thing, so the intuition type might end up showing a similar attitude to the body and other sensory stuff, elevating it to some sort of cult.