>>16987507(OP) I'll bet Musk getting political had some effect on this. NASA wouldn't want to be seen as endorsing certain political trends. Especially ones their bureaucracy may oppose.
00
Anonymous05/29/26(Fri)01:58:55
No more New Glenn. That pad is toast, it'll be at least a year before they can even think about another launch.
Musk doesn't need Nasa to land on the moon though. He can launch a private mission after he raises money from the ipo.
00
Anonymous05/29/26(Fri)05:19:07
>>16989459 >He can launch a private mission With what rocket? With what spacecraft?
00
Anonymous05/29/26(Fri)06:07:05
>>16989192 >>16989124 >NASA gives contract to Jeff Bezos >Jeff Bezos's rockets and launch pad explode 3 days later coincidence? was this Elon Musk himself, or was it ordered by Donald Trump?
>>16990563 You think Bezos is a decent human being? He's a jew, isnt he? So he automatically thinks he's chosen and his race us better than everyone else. Still think he's a decent person?
00
Anonymous06/02/26(Tue)12:18:20
>>16989495 Musk wants people to get into space. He's not trying to keep people down. That is likely a projection of your own mentality.
00
Anonymous06/02/26(Tue)13:03:18
>>16989009 Who makes the laws, accepts the bribes, and enforces it all at the point of a gun. Government.
What population do people in government stem from? The same as companies. So what magically filters out bad people from entering government that inexplicably incapable of filtering those same evildoers from companies? None. You’re just an ignorant leftist.
NASA wants competition and multiple contractors. NASA knows SpaceX is far ahead but it wants a backup, and Blue Origin is the only other USA company worth considering. SpaceX DOES get most contracts.
00
Anonymous06/06/26(Sat)22:12:27
At certain things. Elon and Jeff are rivals but Jeff is only just getting into relanding rockets while Elon seems to be focusing on payload, bigger rockets and the starlink internet thing. Competition is good and them concentrating on slightly different things is great for the space race since NASA, who have the most data and technical expertise aren't trying to do what Elon and Jeff are doing. And if they keep choosing SpaceX for everything then it will create a monopoly and we want Elon and Jeff to have a bit of competition.
00
Anonymous06/09/26(Tue)09:41:18
>>16992565 >You think Bezos is a decent human being? He's a jew, isnt he? No. he is from a family of midwest baptists, retard.
>>16995177 >>16987507(OP) More like NASA is a fully infected leftist organization. Bezos is a leftist (progressive) supporter, while Musk is seen as a chud. This shit is 100% ideological.
>>16988942 >>16988998 BO's mission architecture requires either refueling or tugs. Only the cargo only V1 can make it to the moon solo on New Glenn 7x2 V1.5 Blue Moon lander (human lander, scaled down V2) cannot alone with New Glenn 7x2. It requires 1 or more tugs. V2 requires refueling like Starship HLS
This can change with New Glenn 9x4 but that rocket flat out doesn't exist.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)15:36:33
>>16997081 As much as I dont like to believe it these retards just uploaded a post apologizing/making excuses for the new 4 person team not having women.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)15:53:55
why here though, isn't /pol/ more fun for people like you? hide and goodbye
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)16:28:27
>>16987507(OP) >How? Bribery. Blackmail. Cunny. The usual.