/sci/ — Why isn't it possible?

>>16997957 (OP)
it would have to always be running and even then it would only generate half of a half a percentage of phone power in a day

>>16997957 (OP)
it is possible. it will not be economical.

Nooo don't do that!
Or else there won't be water for the poor datacenterinos

>>16997957 (OP)
What if you used extreme gear ratios, and multiple levels of flow?

what is it with retards and trying to extract energy from falling shit?

>>16997957 (OP)
the possible approach is droplet TENG in drainage pipes, but even that doesn't give you enough to incentivice replacing lead pipes

>>16997957 (OP)
Go ask your parents how much it'd cost on the water bill for the 5,000 gallons you'd waste charging up your phone like this.

File: 1768271866350383.jpg (120 KB, 770x600)

>>16997970
Most of the behaviour on this board is essentially related. Anons are "smart but lazy" so they attempt to validate their self-perceived intelligence by coming up with breakthroughs. However they usually have little actual knowledge so this leads to retarded shit. It can also lead to deeper schizotardation for the more "gifted" individuals. Or worship of ecelebs like Weinstein, Hossenfucker etc. Then there's LLMs, a dangerous plaything for idiots.

File: IMG_1781095653707.jpg (157 KB, 1536x1024)

>>16997957 (OP)
Thomas A Anderson Had a Job. Not U.B.I. thats indicative.

https://pastebin.com/1DD4z9c8

https://pastebin.com/E4vGTe5e

>>16997957 (OP)
Interrogate. Perhap. Why a tap.

>>16997957 (OP)
Moral Audit

>>16997960
We aint lobsters. Overunity instant charge batteries.

>>16997982
It looks like just another high IQ idea. High IQ people come up with bullshit like this all the time, and think that people are just fucking stupid that they don't want to implement their brilliant ideas.

File: file_0000000082bc720bbc8cfaf553d1ad42.png (1.86 MB, 1402x1122)

They were Pre So Much.
Whether Valid, or Otherwise.

Might Be Mistaken, Goodluck

>>16997957 (OP)
>will pay for itself in only 17 years!

>>16998010
>payment caps at 10cents as per Reality Safeguard

>>16997957 (OP)
The electricity to pump water to begin with is reflected in the water bill. But it would charge your phone more than half a percentage.

>Loadshed NegaPlex Actual

>>16998016
>sinister dialectics forming. Not happy. Tsk. Tsk.

>throwing a shaton board at pigeons and blaming them for shitting on the board.
Could it had been an insane dialectical? Updated Sociology Indicates

File: file_00000000328071faa92bc98231efb8e5.jpg (175 KB, 1024x1536)

>>16998019
>Indicates
Pending...

>Answer?

>>16997957 (OP)
Its possible asfuck. unpraise everungiving chargeria.

>Charge it To Answer?

File: FB_IMG_1781059881666.jpg (82 KB, 1600x800)

>Glorify For nuffin? Through InterLives and Planes?
>This Planet is Weird.
>Extend List
>Of
>...

Have a Wonderful Whatev GoodDay

it actually is. you would basically recuperate part of the energy that was used to pump the water into water tower. you own mini-PHES.

Its My InStore. UnLimbo. Or Extra Bardo. Before. ?. So Others Can Surpass.
Why on weird Earth would this frighten. If Oneself Still Gets There. Unless...

File: file_00000000b324720bb7804f0ee0ada8cd.png (1.56 MB, 1024x1024)

>>16997957 (OP)

>>16997970
>gravity is powerful, unlimited and free
gee idk,you fucking retard

>>16998085
you forget it takes energy to lift rock in first place, and grabity is a tight-fisted republican force, so zero sum rock game

It would create a stupidly mimiscule amount of electricity

How long do you keep the faucet running? I don't have dishwasher, and it takes me like 5 minutes to clean daily dishes.

>>16997957 (OP)
It is, that's how hydro plants work. They build them big because it's more efficient though.

They should make one of these that I can put on my dick

>>16998352
>It is, that's how hydro plants work.
yeah, except the water cycle and aquifers do all the uphill pushing for you
for the faucet, people pump water up a tower or pressurize it some other way, which takes more energy than you recover

>>16998010
I don't think it would EVER pay for itself no matter how long you used it because the returns would be so minimal and you would have to maintain/repair it. It would be a net loss.

>>16997968
Starve the beasts!