/trv/ — Why is ___ tourism looked down upon?

>>2889117 (OP)
You really shouldn’t HAVE to pay for sex if you’re younger than at least your late 30s. It shouldn’t even be hard enough to get for free that you’re justified for wanting to just pay for it instead. Also, some of sex tourism is child sex tourism or sexual slavery which is obviously evil. Beyond that, no reason to look down on it. And even the first point isn’t that big of a deal, just kind of lame.

It's just waste of money. I could understand some BJ bars or Thai massage hj which is quite cheap if limited to once a week coom, but some people spend crazy stupid amount of money

>>2889122
What if I'm socially retarded?

>>2889117 (OP)
Virtue signalling about it is a race to the bottom for feminists to try to appease their vagina masters. It's an empty shit test by women. They don't actually care that you do it, and they even do it too.

>>2889125
then you shouldn't be engaging in any activity where there is even a chance of passing on your worthless genes

>>2889122
>You really shouldn’t HAVE to pay for sex if you’re younger than at least your late 30s
people who say things like this are usually plappers. Very few guys in their 30s can get sex with an actual attractive woman in the US because so many American women are fat fucks now.

>>2889143
Ok fair enough. If you’re American change late 30s to early 30s and my point still stands.

>>2889117 (OP)
Yes as you can see the primary form of cope >>2889122 the "have to" argument comes out immediately. The American struggles to conceive of two things - 1) 'have to' is entirely beside the point as its a different experience and this is proven by some of the biggest natural players also being the biggest mongers 2) even if one genuinely 'has to', its a really funny line for any American to use unless he's a gigachad, because we've all seen the amount of time and money the avg American has to put into getting laid for inconsistent results with mediocre women.

>>2889117 (OP)
No matter what cope you try to spin, paying for sex will always be far more pathetic than just being a virgin

>>2889154
> this is proven by some of the biggest natural players also being the biggest mongers
lmao

>>2889158
Not the best example but one everybody knows: Trump
>inb4 some TDS retard claims Trump was never actually a player

>>2889122
You're acting like younger guys can smile at the girl and refuse to give her a single baht, and she just sighs and waves and walks out the door emptyhanded.

If you're actually handsome and she's starstruck with you, then yes. But most of the time, the acting vanishes when it is time to demand money. She turns cold and demanding all of a sudden. You'll see that women are the same the world over. If they don't respect you, they will walk all over you.