/v/ — .

Yes, remakes are inherently bad.

>>740865338 (OP)
remakes were a mistake. the only exception is when the same creators that made the original game are involved like with REmake

These are 2 opinions presented as 1

>>740865425
fpbp

>>740865338 (OP)
>Remake is a 1:1 recreation

then it's a REMASTER

>remakes are bad
>remakes the same thread every other week

>>740865425
/thread

>>740865338 (OP)
you're so close to getting it, >>740865425 knows the truth

>>740865338 (OP)
Yes, I never asked for this. Why would you do it now when AAA cant even walk a step before tripping themselves.

>>740865691
Ironically no one cares what you asked for and remakes generally sell pretty well, so you're not the target audience, you're the minority, and a minority.
>>740865574
Truke I have remake seethe fatigue.

>>740865338 (OP)
there's literally zero evidence of the phenomenon this post posits

>>740865923
I've been seeing this for years yet game quality keeps going down... hmmmmm

>>740865338 (OP)
haven't seen anyone do the top

>>740865425
fippy bippy

File: 1770676982579206.jpg (27 KB, 500x257)

>>740865338 (OP)
fixed

>>740865425
fpbp

>>740865425
>Remake is
Coulda left it at that. Even a "well done" remake is still a remake, and resources were poured into making something we've already played before. It's a zero sum game. If something is being made, that means something else is not being made. If they're spending years of development time on one thing, they're not developing something else.
>they could be working on multiple projects!!!!
Then it means they're not pouring as much as they could into something new to develop a remake of something we've already played.

I don't want remakes, I want re-releases with perfect performance and zero bugs.

what compels this retard to just make threads with comics instead of asking the questions in the revelant threads

>>740866056
2020s has had a noticeable quality increase over the pissfilter era of the 2010s. The issue is that the 2010s was full of 4s-6s and the 2020s is extreme on both ends with 1s and 10s.

>>740865338 (OP)
>Charge $90 for a game you already own
>Defile the game that you love

>>740865338 (OP)
remakes are retarded and gay, glad you finally noticed

>>740866098
It's a loose fit, but it does happen when companies delist or end support for originals once they pump out a remaster (fully priced, of course). Like with the Warcraft 3 demake, which IIRC Blizzard intended to fully supplant the original.

File: 1761720231099847.png (196 KB, 983x768)

>>740865574
>same threads
>same posts
>same posters
>same images
>for years to decades at a time

Unless it's like the FF7 remake, don't even bother.

>>740865338 (OP)
Apart from MGS3, name another 1-1 remake that is a recreation

>>740866326
brownoid engagement farms. saaaarrrr is paid 0.005 per post.

File: 1752811619984837.png (192 KB, 680x582)

>>740865338 (OP)
I have never been angry at a 1:1 recreation, ever, they are so rare this is more like my face for one

>>740865338 (OP)
ideally remasters/remakes should just be the original game but running at higher resolutions and framerates and sane default controls

>>740865425
Closing the thread. Nothing else needs to be said.

>>740866642
Shadow of the Colossus on PS4

>>740865338 (OP)
>Not a new game
Correct

>>740865425
Yeah.

>>740866264
>>740866693
God if only these were what we got.
Closest to this kind of thing are open source ports like Open X-Com and doom ports

>>740865338 (OP)
Top one is correct
Bottom one are faggots who don’t understand what a remake is supposed to be

>>740865338 (OP)
Nah, I love remakes of old games that take a different spin on it.

>>740865338 (OP)
What's the point of remaking if you're just going to do a 1:1 recreation?

File: 1781190950640.jpg (1.00 MB, 2687x4096)

>>740865338 (OP)
There are very few good remakes and they don't exist to make money

>>740865338 (OP)

just ignore the bitch telling you little Caesars is shit and enjoy your pizza bro

>>740866263
>Then it means they're not pouring as much as they could into something new to develop a remake of something we've already played
Get the fuck out. Like you believe for a fucking second you would want what they "something new" modern developers would make. Bullshit. You wouldn't trust them to develop an ad for a new IP or game, much less actually develop a new IP or game. And for good reason.

File: nword.png (71 KB, 328x294)

>>740865338 (OP)
>remake is a 1:1 recreation
Not paying for the same game twice
>remake is not a 1:1 recreation
Making the game worse is not an improvement

>>740865338 (OP)
Demakes should all be destroyed along with everyone who likes them.

>>740865425
Fpbp

>>740865425
yup

>>740865425
Fpbp
Trvke

OP is brown as usual

>>740865338 (OP)
I don't like 1:1 recreations when I know the company can do better. If OoT is a 1:1 recreation, it would be disappointing because the last time Nintendo tried to do a remake with LttP they actually just spun it in to a whole new sequel that was good in its own right, and they've also done good remakes with new content like Metroid Zero Mission.

I don't like remakes with new shit when the company has become so wildly incompetent since the original game came out that they can't be trusted with adding anything new to it. See Final Fantasy VII Remake.

if it's a 1:1 recreation it's a rerelease
if it's not a 1:1 recreaction it's a spinoff

>>740866921
if you have something good that people like then whats the point of changing shit for the sake of changing shit

I'm afraid remakes and rereleases will never stop. It will be the safest bet to do till the end of time. Just like internet is only few sites now, all of future culture will roll around the few universally recognized brands. Originality will die and art itself will be forgotten, as everything can be generated.

>>740868272
It's because game dev has become so bloated financially and timeline wise that new IPs are extremely risky. Wasting 100m bucks developing an unproven game only for it to flop is a risk a lot of companies don't want to take. There's also the fact that the overwhelming majority of these IPs are from the 90s and 00s, because back then you could have a game be a hit, pump out a sequel every year, and have a reliable franchise in the space of 3 years compared to 10+ now. Remakes are a great way to mitigate that risk because you have an established fanbase already that you're tugging nostalgia strings for, a proven game that you can just copy to roadmap the remake, and a way to get new players interested in your IP. There's zero reason not to remake everything from the 90s.

File: 1484929210529.gif (66 KB, 200x200)

>>740865425

>>740865425
Kill yourself
Video games toys and need a remake after every 10yrs

The whole remake dilemma could easily be solved if the original was included with the remake or available separately
oldfarts wouldn't seethe because they can just play the original and shut the fuck up, zoomers wouldn't obsess over playing the best or most recent version and just make up their own mind based on game screenshots/gameplay and personal taste

the remake/remaster hate is performative and so are the people who suck them off regardless if they are actually good or needed, people should chill the fuck up and just play whatever they want, nobody is forcing you to purchase optional luxury products, just do everyone a favor and don't stink up discussion forums with your uninformed retarded garbage ass irrelevant opinion

File: 1763607765550652.png (159 KB, 613x313)

>>740865338 (OP)
This is how actual human beings feel about remakes

File: 1781193719597736.png (187 KB, 500x500)

>>740865338 (OP)

not really

>>740869643
This is an English speaking board.

File: Truth Nukem.png (2.00 MB, 1064x788)

>>740865425
Nothing but facts. Could just port it if you REALLY want the extra bucks

>>740869696
I think the last time I saw a company actually do that was the Medievil remake, but you had to complete some sidequest at the end of the game to unlock it.