>doesn't say a single word >just shows a bunch of old gameplay and development clips in comparison to new >people somehow lose their shit and want his head on a stick
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)15:03:54
>>740865787(OP) >first video has a segment where he compares audio levels >people on twitter call him out for reducing the volume in 4R >second video he proves he didn’t change it Did any of them at least apologize for this?
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)15:04:55
Crowbcurrylips got gaped
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)15:06:01
>>740866128 It was a bullshit callout anyways. The guy claiming to be an "audio engineer" cranked up the volume on the remake and when people asked him to show other scenes at the same audio level he disappeared.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)15:11:40
>>740866128 Except the very streamers who he clipped said the audio levels were reduced. And you can pull up those streamer clips and hear that the audio levels are not as low as in crowbfags video. You can also just pull up a basic media player that graphs the audio levels and you can see he reduced the volume. It is not like it is hard to do in an editor. He made the audio difference 6db less. He's the definition of a little bitch. He got upset people didn't agree with is "assessment" so he had to come back a year later and hope people wouldn't call him out on his bullshit a 2nd time.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)15:15:00
>>740866128 It was worthless criticism like bitching that the RE4make is too dark. Turn the fucking gamma/audio up. Even the original had basic settings on the gamecube. Then in his follow up video he got a spineless lolcow like Michael and a fucking manchild that thinks the original doctor salvatore was scarier than the remake because it was a ganado with a bag on his head.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)15:15:01
>>740866643 Yeah we know, crowbcastrationvictim lost and only retards with a parasocial relationship keep defending him.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)15:19:59
>>740866128 >second video he proves he didn’t change it no, they just chose not to acknowledge that section at all
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)15:25:04
>>740865787(OP) How come you guys make fun of people who like ecelebs but you can't stop sucking off this one?
>>740865787(OP) Flak is always heaviest over the target.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)16:15:30
Remake4 is soulless forgotten slop, so Crowbcat wins
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)16:17:12
>>740865787(OP) A reminder he changed the title on this video within hours of it coming out because he was getting shit for calling the remake "soulless"
I will never play the demake. >>740867527 Confirmation bias. There were plenty of people on this board who favor the remake and were upset about this video.
>try to go NEW BAD OLD GOOD at a remake that's pretty good >lose any minor credibility you had because you forgot you weren't on /v/ and doing this with good games makes you autistic
>remake sucks >brown zoomers like it because it's fresh and new to them >rather than accept that they have a guilty pleasure, they lash out violently at their betters Many such cases
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)16:54:57
>>740866643 >>740866864 >>740866867 None of you know what dynamic range is despite it being featured in the second vid. Re4r has much more range than the OG, for you tards that means soft is more soft, and loud still close to zero db like every other piece of media etc. They made re4r this way to make guns "louder". In the OG the gunshots jump the audio level from -10db to -16 up to close to 0. And re4r has the audio level jump from -32db or lower to close to 0. This is all in crow's 2nd video, if a streamer has a "louder" audio level it's due to audio editing the streamer made live such as dynamic compression. At a certain point the human ear just can't hear soft sounds well, -30db is simply too much and cranking your volume dial inbetween gunfights is not a real option, the devs should have made a game that is designed around the human ear and its limits.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)17:15:07
>>740865787(OP) nahh lil bro unc thought he cooked with that one but bruh cuz is the one who done got cooked lmao
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)17:18:21
>>740873650 >shit on OoT remake I hope so, it would be an amazing shitshow
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)17:27:51
>>740865787(OP) some of his points were good and some of them were either factually incorrect or contradicted his other points about difficulty. I do think his main points about 'soul vs soulless', the yellow paint, etc. are fair though but he had a couple blunders in there if you actually watch it and do some critical thinking this guy makes some good points both for and against crowbcat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHWDJjy9hn0
>>740875251 You don't need to speak like a moron to talk me into siding with Crowbcat, I already do
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)17:37:14
>>740876710 they're both good unless you're blinded by nostalgia and can't enjoy new things with an open mind, then yes I agree it's absolute garbage and nobody could possibly enjoy it
>these people are so young they think re4 was good and didn't cause re5 and 6 development direction >filled with flavor-of-the-year mechanics like quicktime events >jewtuber thread i hate every single one of you faggots and i hope you all rot in hell
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)17:38:43
>>740865787(OP) Seeing bawk seethe and cope so hard was hilarious.
>>740873728 Again, he never said re4 remake was bad in the video, he just pointed out some very evident issues with the remake (and all capcom's remakes in general). If he made a video about re2 remake it would he even funnier
Reminder Crapcum spends millions on marketing their games including IG, LinkedIN, Facebook with a fuckton of bots. You noticed how once PT II was uploaded you had hundreds of Capcom Creators and marketers all releasing at the same time with the same dismissive talking points? Dont be gaslit.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)17:39:39
>>740876935 It's just the cycle with this retarded fanbase. Original RE4 also had a very vocal element shitting on it constantly for not being fixed camera anymore, and then every game after continued that trend. Now the original RE4 fans have become that vocal element.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)17:39:42
>>740877029 >bawk cant tell if hes more autist or more grifter
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)17:40:36
>>740865787(OP) >doesn't say a single word The title says it all.
>>740876921 I can enjoy new things that are good. This isn't.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)17:45:02
>>740876935 These "RE4 was always bad" revisionism attempts will never not be funny.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)17:45:11
>>740876935 >these people are so young they think re4 was good and didn't cause re5 and 6 development direction RE4 was good and also caused the RE5 and 6 development direction which was bad
>>740877435 agree to disagree but you're in the extreme minority
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)17:46:28
>>740876921 Its not a new thing Its a remake It has to be compared to what came before to know if they did a good job >here i remade the mona lisa >dont check with old photos to see if this is correct >so what if shes now a dude and also a martian >you're just a chud with shit taste Now you'll complain video games and a painting arent the same And thats because video games arent art
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)17:46:35
>>740877558 Or are you just assuming that to dismiss the arguments of people you disagree with?
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)17:47:55
>>740876921 The movement in the remake is plainly bad
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)17:48:27
>>740877603 It's funny how not liking remakes is only disallowed for video games People diss film remakes all the time, book remakes are practically non-existent, and people would riot if they tried to remake classical art
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)17:48:44
>SINGLE guy makes a video >MINDBREAKS remakesissies FOREVER
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)17:48:50
>>740877603 I didn't say it was good in comparison to the original, I said "it's good" as in general. Do I think it's good if you're looking at the original and expecting a similar, polished experience around the original gameplay and art? No, I don't think it's good. I'd even say they fucked up in their attempt at remaking it from an artistic and comprehensive understanding of the original. But as a game, it's good.
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)17:49:58
he’s always been a quirk chungus for redditors. I’m glad they turned on him. use your voice coward
00
Anonymous06/11/26(Thu)17:50:30
>>740877697 I enjoy the movement a lot actually, there's a lot of subtle nuance to how Leon stumbles and shifts his weight. I understand fans of the original and people that prefer older games are going to greatly prefer more snappy, direct movement but I can enjoy both for offering different experiences. It's polished well even if you don't like the modern style of movement.